Readability of patient discharge instructions with and without the use of electronically available disease-specific templates

Author:

Mueller Stephanie K11,Giannelli Kyla11,Boxer Robert11,Schnipper Jeffrey L11

Affiliation:

1. BWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Low health literacy is common, leading to patient vulnerability during hospital discharge, when patients rely on written health instructions. We aimed to examine the impact of the use of electronic, patient-friendly, templated discharge instructions on the readability of discharge instructions provided to patients at discharge. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of 233 patients discharged from a large tertiary care hospital to their homes following the implementation of a web-based “discharge module,” which included the optional use of diagnosis-specific templated discharge instructions. We compared the readability of discharge instructions, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Level test (FREL, on a 0–100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater readability) and the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level test (FKGL, measured in grade levels), between discharges that used templated instructions (with or without modification) versus discharges that used clinician-generated instructions (with or without available templated instructions for the specific discharge diagnosis). Results Templated discharge instructions were provided to patients in 45% of discharges. Of the 55% of patients that received clinician-generated discharge instructions, the majority (78.1%) had no available templated instruction for the specific discharge diagnosis. Templated discharge instructions had higher FREL scores (71 vs. 57, P < .001) and lower FKGL scores (5.6 vs. 7.6, P < .001), compared to clinician-generated discharge instructions. Discussion The use of electronically available templated discharge instructions was associated with better readability (a higher FREL score and a lower FKGL score) than the use of clinician-generated discharge instructions. The main reason for clinicians to create discharge instructions was the lack of available templates for the patient’s specific discharge diagnosis. Conclusions Use of electronically available templated discharge instructions may be a viable option to improve the readability of written material provided to patients at discharge, although the library of available templates requires expansion.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference32 articles.

1. Adult literacy in America: a first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey;Kirsch,2002

2. Patients who can't read. Implications for the health care system;Miles;JAMA.,1995

3. Knowledge of antiretroviral regimen dosing and adherence: a longitudinal study;Miller;Clin Infect Dis.,2003

4. Adherence to combination antiretroviral therapies in HIV patients of low health literacy;Kalichman;J Gen Intern Med.,1999

5. Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission;Baker;J Gen Intern Med.,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3