Impact of G-CSF Prophylaxis on Chemotherapy Dose-Intensity, Link Between Dose-Intensity and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Author:

Canton Clémence12ORCID,Boussari Olayidé23,Boulin Mathieu24,Le Malicot Karine23ORCID,Taieb Julien5ORCID,Dahan Laetitia6ORCID,Lopez Anthony7,Lepage Come12,Bachet Jean-Baptiste8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon , Dijon , France

2. EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté , Dijon , France

3. Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive , Dijon , France

4. Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Dijon , Dijon , France

5. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Carpem, Sorbonne Paris City, Paris Descartes University , Paris , France

6. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology , La Timone, AMU, Marseille , France

7. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois , Nancy , France

8. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris , France

Abstract

Abstract Background In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Results Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in “prophylaxis” group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group: HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group: HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22). Conclusion Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3