Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems

Author:

Jacoby Nir12ORCID,Landau-Wells Marika3,Pearl Jacob4,Paul Alexandra4,Falk Emily B4567,Bruneau Emile G4,Ochsner Kevin N2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College , Moore Hall, 3 Maynard St, Hanover, NH 03755, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Columbia University , 1190 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA

3. Travers Department of Political Science, University of California-Berkeley , 210 Barrows Hall #1950, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

4. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania , 3620 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

5. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania , 3733 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

6. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania , 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

7. Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania , 202 S 36th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Abstract

Abstract Political partisanship is often conceived as a lens through which people view politics. Behavioral research has distinguished two types of “partisan lenses”—policy-based and identity-based—that may influence peoples’ perception of political events. Little is known, however, about the mechanisms through which partisan discourse appealing to policy beliefs or targeting partisan identities operate within individuals. We addressed this question by collecting neuroimaging data while participants watched videos of speakers expressing partisan views. A “partisan lens effect” was identified as the difference in neural synchrony between each participant’s brain response and that of their partisan ingroup vs. outgroup. When processing policy-based messaging, a partisan lens effect was observed in socio-political reasoning and affective responding brain regions. When processing negative identity-based attacks, a partisan lens effect was observed in mentalizing and affective responding brain regions. These data suggest that the processing of political discourse that appeals to different forms of partisanship is supported by related but distinguishable neural—and therefore psychological—mechanisms, which may have implications for how we characterize partisanship and ameliorate its deleterious impacts.

Funder

Beyond Conflict

The Germanacos Foundation

Annenberg School for Communication

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3