Affiliation:
1. Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University
2. MIT Sloan School of Management
3. Princeton University, Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen, and National Bureau of Economic Research
Abstract
Abstract
We examine historical banking crises through the lens of bank equity declines, which cover a broad sample of episodes of banking distress with and without banking panics. To do this, we construct a new data set on bank equity returns and narrative information on banking panics for 46 countries over the period of 1870 to 2016. We find that even in the absence of panics, large bank equity declines are associated with substantial credit contractions and output gaps. Although panics are an important amplification mechanism, our results indicate that panics are not necessary for banking crises to have severe economic consequences. Furthermore, panics tend to be preceded by large bank equity declines, suggesting that panics are the result, rather than the cause, of earlier bank losses. We use bank equity returns to uncover a number of forgotten historical banking crises and create a banking crisis chronology that distinguishes between bank equity losses and panics.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference73 articles.
1. The Bankers' New Clothes
2. “Vulnerable Growth,”;Adrian;American Economic Review,2019
3. “Exports and Financial Shocks,”;Amiti;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011
4. “New Belgian Stock Market Returns: 1832–1914,”;Annaert;Explorations in Economic History,2012
5. “Deposit Withdrawals,”;Artavanis,2019
Cited by
88 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献