User Experience of a (Semi-) Automated Cognitive Phone-Based Assessment Within a Memory Clinic Population

Author:

ter Huurne Daphne12ORCID,Ramakers Inez12,Possemis Nina12,König Alexandra3,Linz Nicklas4,Tröger Johannes4,Langel Kai5,Verhey Frans6,de Vugt Marjolein6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology , Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Dr. Tanslaan 12, , 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands

2. Maastricht University , Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Dr. Tanslaan 12, , 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands

3. National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA), Stars team , route des Lucioles 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France

4. ki elements , Bleichstrasse 27, 66121 Saarbrücken, Germany

5. Janssen Clinical Innovation , Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium

6. Department of Psychiatry and psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+) , P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Objective We examined the user experience in different modalities (face-to-face, semi-automated phone-based, and fully automated phone-based) of cognitive testing in people with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Method A total of 67 participants from the memory clinic of the Maastricht University Medical Center+ participated in the study. The study consisted of cognitive tests in different modalities, namely, face-to-face, semi-automated phone-based guided by a researcher, and fully automated phone-based without the involvement of a researcher. After each assessment, a user experience questionnaire was administered, including questions about, for example, satisfaction, simplicity, and missing personal contact, on a seven-point Likert scale. Non-parametric tests were used to compare user experiences across different modalities. Results In all modalities, user experiences were rated above average. The face-to-face ratings were comparable to the ratings of the semi-automated phone-based assessment, except for the satisfaction and recommendation items, which were rated higher for the face-to-face assessment. The face-to-face assessment was preferred above the fully automated phone-based assessment on all items. In general, the semi- and fully automated phone-based assessments were comparable (simplicity, conceivability, quality of sound, visiting the hospital, and missing personal contact), while on all the other items, the semi-automated phone-based assessment was preferred. Conclusions User experience was rated high within all modalities. Simplicity, conceivability, comfortability, and participation scores were comparable in the semi-automated phone-based and face-to-face assessment. Based on these findings and earlier research on validation of the semi-automated phone-based assessment, the semi-automated assessment could be useful for screening for clinical trials, and after more research, in clinical practice.

Funder

EIT Health

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3