Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing People With Dementia Exiting or Getting Lost

Author:

Emrich-Mills Luke1ORCID,Puthusseryppady Vaisakh2,Hornberger Michael123

Affiliation:

1. Research Development Programme for Older People’s Services, Research and Development, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Julian Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, UK

2. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK

3. Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives People with dementia are at risk of exiting premises unsupervised, eloping, or getting lost, potentially leading to harmful or distressing consequences. This review aimed to estimate the effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia from exiting or getting lost. Research Design and Methods A systematic review of English sources was undertaken. Health care (EMBASE, BNI, Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, HTA, CENTRAL) and gray literature (OpenGrey) databases were searched using prespecified search terms. Additional studies were identified by hand-searching bibliographies of relevant reviews and included studies. Wide inclusion criteria were set to capture a range of intervention types. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were completed independently by two reviewers. Methods were preregistered on PROSPERO. Results Individual and overall risk of bias was too high for statistical meta-analyses. A narrative synthesis was therefore performed. Twenty-five studies with 814 participants were included, investigating a range of nonpharmacological interventions aiming to prevent exiting, facilitate retrieval, educate participants, or a combination of these. Seventeen (68%) of the included studies had critical risks of internal bias to outcomes, providing no useful evidence for the effectiveness of their respective interventions. The remaining 8 (32%) studies had serious risks of bias. Narrative synthesis of results yielded no overall robust evidence for the effectiveness of any interventions. Discussion and Implications No evidence was found to justify the recommendation of any interventions included in this review. Future studies should focus on high-quality, controlled study designs.

Funder

Earle & Stuart Charitable Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference62 articles.

1. Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering;Algase;Aging & Mental Health,2007

2. Evaluating an electronic monitoring system for people who wander;Altus;American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease,2000

3. Chapter 21: Reviews in health promotion and public health.;Armstrong,2011

4. Dementia, walking outdoors and getting lost: Incidence, risk factors and consequences from dementia-related police missing-person reports;Bantry White;Aging & Mental Health,2014

5. Electronic tracking for people with dementia who get lost outside the home: A study of the experience of familial carers;Bantry White;British Journal of Occupational Therapy,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3