Abstract
AbstractMoney is neither a thing nor a concept. Rather, as many writers have rightly suggested, money is a relation. But what kind of relation? This articles refuses the now seemingly common-sense notion that money is an ‘institution’ or a ‘public good’. Instead, it insists on specifying money as a concrete relation between creditor and debtor. To grasp money in both its practical and conceptual complexity, we must see it as an array. The money array is comprised of four elements: (1) a token that symbolizes the money relation; (2) a creditor who holds the token; (3) a debtor on whom the token makes a claim; (4) a denomination, i.e., the named quantity of credit/debt. The money array makes clear that no form of the money stuff - as money, i.e., as part of the money relation - ever possesses any positive, intrinsic value. The raison d’être of the money stuff - of any coin, note, bill, check, or digital token - is not to contain, have, or incarnate value. Money has no value. The value element of the money relation never lies in the money stuff, but rather can only be located across the entire money array.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Finance,History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference52 articles.
1. ‘The Great Divergence’: Max Weber and China's ‘missing links’;Ingham;Max Weber Studies,2015
2. Mehrling, P. (2016) The economics of money and banking. Handout for ECON V3265, Barnard College, Columbia University, Fall Semester.
3. What is money?;Innes;Banking Law Journal,1913
4. Who owes? Class struggle, inequality and the political economy of leverage in the twenty-first century
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Introduction;The Financial Image;2023-12-29