Marine reservoir ages for coastal West Africa
-
Published:2023-08-17
Issue:2
Volume:5
Page:345-359
-
ISSN:2628-3719
-
Container-title:Geochronology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geochronology
Author:
Soulet GuillaumeORCID, Maestrati Philippe, Gofas Serge, Bayon Germain, Dewilde Fabien, Labonne Maylis, Dennielou Bernard, Ferraton Franck, Siani Giuseppe
Abstract
Abstract. We measured the 14C age of pre-bomb
suspension-feeding bivalves of known age from coastal West Africa across a
latitudinal transect extending from 33∘ N to 15∘ S. The
specimens are from collections belonging to the Muséum National
d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France). They were carefully chosen to ensure
that the specimens were collected alive or that they died not long before collection.
From the 14C dating of the known-age bivalves, we calculated the marine
reservoir age (as ΔR and R values) for each specimen. ΔR
values were calculated relative to the Marine20 calibration curve, and the R
values were calculated relative to Intcal20 or SHcal20 calibration curves. Except for five
outliers, the ΔR and R values were generally homogenous with
weighted mean values of −72 ± 42 14C years (1 SD, n=24) and 406 ± 56 14C years (1 SD, n=24) respectively. These values are
typical of low-latitude marine reservoir age values. Five suspension-feeding
species living in five different ecological habitats were studied. For
localities where several species were available, the results yielded similar
results whatever the species considered, suggesting that, in these locations,
the habitat has only a limited impact on marine reservoir age
reconstruction. We show that our measured marine reservoir ages follow the
declining trend of the global marine reservoir age starting ca. 1900 CE,
suggesting that the marine reservoir age of coastal West Africa is driven,
at least to the first order, by the atmospheric CO2 14C ageing due to
fossil fuel burning rather than by local effects. Each outlier was
discussed. Local upwelling conditions or sub-fossil specimens may explain
the older 14C age and thus the larger marine reservoir ages for these
samples. Bucardium ringens might not be the best choice for marine reservoir age
reconstructions.
Funder
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference88 articles.
1. Alves, E. Q., Macario, K., Ascough, P., and Bronk Ramsey, C.: The worldwide
marine radiocarbon reservoir effect: Definitions, mechanisms, and prospects,
Rev. Geophys., 56, 278–305, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000588, 2018. 2. Alves, E. Q., Macario, K. D., Urrutia, F. P., Cardoso, R. P., and Bronk
Ramsey, C.: Accounting for the marine reservoir effect in radiocarbon
calibration, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 209, 129–138,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.02.013, 2019. 3. Arnold, J. R. and Anderson, E. C.: The distribution of Carbon-14 in nature,
Tellus, 9, 28–32, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01850.x, 1957. 4. Ascough, P., Cook, G., and Dugmore, A.: Methodological approaches to
determining the marine radiocarbon reservoir effect, Prog. Phys. Geogr.
Earth Environ., 29, 532–547, https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp461ra,
2005. 5. Bard, E.: Correction of accelerator mass spectrometry 14C ages measured in
planktonic foraminifera: Paleoceanographic implications, Paleoceanography,
3, 635–645, https://doi.org/10.1029/PA003i006p00635, 1988.
|
|