Abstract
Abstract. This study compares the distribution of bulk soil organic
carbon (SOC), its fractions (unprotected and physically, chemically, and biochemically
protected), available phosphorus (Pavail), organic nitrogen (Norg), and
stable isotope (δ15N and δ13C) signatures at
four soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40 cm) between a nearby open
forest reference area and a historical olive orchard (established in 1856)
located in southern Spain. In addition, these soil properties, as well as
water stable aggregates (Wsagg), were contrasted at eroding and
deposition areas within the olive orchard, previously determined using
137Cs. SOC stock in the olive orchard (about 40 t C ha−1) was only
25 % of that in the forested area (about 160 t C ha−1) in the upper
40 cm of soil, and the reduction was especially severe in the unprotected
organic carbon. The reference and the orchard soils also showed significant
differences in the δ13C and δ15N signals, likely
due to the different vegetation composition and N dynamics in both areas.
Soil properties along a catena, from erosion to deposition areas within the
old olive orchard, showed large differences. Soil Corg, Pavail and
Norg content, and δ15N at the deposition were
significantly higher than those of the erosion area, defining two distinct
areas with a different soil quality status. These overall results indicate
that the proper understanding of Corg content and soil quality in olive
orchards requires the consideration of the spatial variability induced by
erosion–deposition processes for a convenient appraisal at the farm scale.
Reference50 articles.
1. Álvarez, S., Soriano, M. A., Landa, B. B., and Gómez, J. A.: Soil
properties in organic olive groves compared with that in natural areas in a
mountainous landscape in southern Spain, Soil Use Manage., 23, 404–416,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00104.x, 2010.
2. Anderson, J. M. and Ingram, J. S. I. (Eds.): Tropical soil biology and
fertility: A handbook of methods, CAB International, Wallingford, UK,
1993.
3. Andrews, S. S. and Carroll, C. R.: Designing a soil quality assessment
tool for sustainable agroecosystem management, Ecol. Appl., 11, 1573–1585,
https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO;2, 2001.
4. Bameri, A., Khormali, F., Amir, K., and Dehghani, A.: Spatial variability of
soil organic carbon in different hillslope positions in Toshan area,
Golestan Province, Iran: Geostatistical approaches, J. Mt. Sci., 12,
1422–1433, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3213-z, 2015.
5. Barthes, B. and Roose, E.: Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil
susceptibility to runoff and erosion: validation at several levels, Catena,
47, 133–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1, 2002.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献