Relative outflow enhancements during major geomagnetic storms – Cluster observations
-
Published:2017-12-15
Issue:6
Volume:35
Page:1341-1352
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Schillings AudreyORCID, Nilsson HansORCID, Slapak RikardORCID, Yamauchi MasatoshiORCID, Westerberg Lars-Göran
Abstract
Abstract. The rate of ion outflow from the polar ionosphere is known to vary by orders of magnitude, depending on the geomagnetic activity. However, the upper limit of the outflow rate during the largest geomagnetic storms is not well constrained due to poor spatial coverage during storm events. In this paper, we analyse six major geomagnetic storms between 2001 and 2004 using Cluster data. The six major storms fulfil the criteria of Dst < −100 nT or Kp > 7+. Since the shape of the magnetospheric regions (plasma mantle, lobe and inner magnetosphere) are distorted during large magnetic storms, we use both plasma beta (β) and ion characteristics to define a spatial box where the upward O+ flux scaled to an ionospheric reference altitude for the extreme event is observed. The relative enhancement of the scaled outflow in the spatial boxes as compared to the data from the full year when the storm occurred is estimated. Only O+ data were used because H+ may have a solar wind origin. The storm time data for most cases showed up as a clearly distinguishable separate peak in the distribution toward the largest fluxes observed. The relative enhancement in the outflow region during storm time is 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher compared to less disturbed time. The largest relative scaled outflow enhancement is 83 (7 November 2004) and the highest scaled O+ outflow observed is 2 × 1014 m−2 s−1 (29 October 2003).
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference47 articles.
1. Axford, W. I.: The polar wind and the terrestrial helium budget, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 6855–6859, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA073i021p06855, 1968. 2. Baker, D. N., Ergun, R. E., Burch, J. L., Jahn, J.-M., Daly, P. W., Friedel, R., Reeves, G. D., Fritz, T. A., and Mitchell, D. G.: A telescopic and microscopic view of a magnetospheric substorm on 31 March 2001, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1862, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014491, 2002. 3. Balogh, A., Carr, C. M., Acuña, M. H., Dunlop, M. W., Beek, T. J., Brown, P., Fornacon, K.-H., Georgescu, E., Glassmeier, K.-H., Harris, J., Musmann, G., Oddy, T., and Schwingenschuh, K.: The Cluster Magnetic Field Investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results, Ann. Geophys., 19, 1207–1217, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1207-2001, 2001. 4. Chappell, C. R., Moore, T. E., and Waite, Jr., J. H.: The ionosphere as a fully adequate source of plasma for the earth's magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 5896–5910, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA06p05896, 1987. 5. Echer, E., Tsurutani, B. T., and Guarnieri, F. L.: Interplanetary origins of November 2004 superstorms, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 72, 280–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.02.009, 2010.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|