Simulation of organics in the atmosphere: evaluation of EMACv2.54 with the Mainz Organic Mechanism (MOM) coupled to the ORACLE (v1.0) submodel
-
Published:2022-04-01
Issue:6
Volume:15
Page:2673-2710
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Pozzer AndreaORCID, Reifenberg Simon F., Kumar VinodORCID, Franco BrunoORCID, Kohl Matthias, Taraborrelli DomenicoORCID, Gromov SergeyORCID, Ehrhart SebastianORCID, Jöckel PatrickORCID, Sander RolfORCID, Fall Veronica, Rosanka SimonORCID, Karydis VlassisORCID, Akritidis DimitrisORCID, Emmerichs TamaraORCID, Crippa Monica, Guizzardi Diego, Kaiser Johannes W.ORCID, Clarisse LievenORCID, Kiendler-Scharr AstridORCID, Tost HolgerORCID, Tsimpidi Alexandra
Abstract
Abstract. An updated and expanded representation of organics in the chemistry general circulation model EMAC
(ECHAM5/MESSy for Atmospheric Chemistry) has been evaluated. First, the
comprehensive Mainz Organic Mechanism (MOM)
in the submodel MECCA (Module Efficiently Calculating the Chemistry of the Atmosphere) was activated with
explicit degradation of organic species up to five carbon atoms and a
simplified mechanism for larger molecules. Second, the ORACLE submodel (version 1.0)
now considers condensation on aerosols for all
organics in the mechanism. Parameterizations for aerosol yields are used only for the lumped species
that are not included in the explicit mechanism.
The simultaneous usage of MOM and ORACLE
allows an efficient estimation of not only the chemical degradation of
the simulated volatile organic compounds but also the contribution
of organics to the growth and fate of (organic) aerosol,
with the complexity of the mechanism largely increased
compared to EMAC simulations with more simplified chemistry.
The model evaluation presented here reveals that the OH concentration is reproduced well globally,
whereas significant biases for observed oxygenated organics are present.
We also investigate the general properties
of the aerosols and their composition, showing that the more
sophisticated and process-oriented secondary aerosol formation does not
degrade the good agreement of previous model configurations with observations at the surface,
allowing further research in the field of gas–aerosol interactions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference164 articles.
1. Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011, 2011. a, b 2. Allen, H., Crounse, J., Kim, M., Teng, A., and Wennberg, P.: ATom: L2 In Situ
Data from Caltech Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (CIT-CIMS), ORNL DAAC [data set],
https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1713, 2019. a 3. Ames, R. B. and Malm, W. C.: Comparison of sulfate and nitrate particle mass
concentrations measured by IMPROVE and the CDN, Atmos. Environ., 35,
905–916, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00369-1, 2001. a, b 4. Andreae, M. O.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8523–8546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019, 2019. a, b, c 5. Apel, E., Asher, E., Hills, A., and Hornbrook, R.: ATom: Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs) from the TOGA instrument, Version 2, ORNL DAAC [data set],
https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1936, 2021. a
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|