Atmospheric drag effects on modelled low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites during the July 2000 Bastille Day event in contrast to an interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions
-
Published:2021-05-07
Issue:3
Volume:39
Page:397-412
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Nwankwo Victor U. J.ORCID, Denig William, Chakrabarti Sandip K., Ajakaiye Muyiwa P., Fatokun Johnson, Akanni Adeniyi W., Raulin Jean-Pierre, Correia EmiliaORCID, Enoh John E., Anekwe Paul I.
Abstract
Abstract. In this work, we simulated the atmospheric drag effect on two model SmallSats (small satellites) in low Earth orbit (LEO) with different ballistic coefficients during 1-month intervals of solar–geomagnetic quiet and perturbed conditions. The goal of this effort was to quantify how solar–geomagnetic activity influences atmospheric drag and perturbs satellite orbits, with particular emphasis on the Bastille Day event. Atmospheric drag compromises satellite operations due to increased ephemeris errors, attitude positional uncertainties and premature satellite re-entry. During a 1-month interval of generally quiescent solar–geomagnetic activity (July 2006), the decay in altitude (h) was a modest 0.53 km (0.66 km) for the satellite with the smaller (larger) ballistic coefficient of 2.2×10-3 m2 kg−1 (3.03×10-3 m2 kg−1). The associated orbital decay rates (ODRs) during this quiet interval ranged from 13 to 23 m per day (from 16 to 29 m per day). For the disturbed interval of July 2000 the significantly increased altitude loss and range of ODRs were 2.77 km (3.09 km) and 65 to 120 m per day (78 to 142 m per day), respectively. Within the two periods, more detailed analyses over 12 d intervals of extremely quiet and disturbed conditions revealed respective orbital decays of 0.16 km (0.20 km) and 1.14 km (1.27 km) for the satellite with the smaller (larger) ballistic coefficient. In essence, the model results show that there was a 6- to 7-fold increase in the deleterious impacts of satellite drag between the quiet and disturbed periods. We also estimated the enhanced atmospheric drag effect on the satellites' parameters caused by the July 2000 Bastille Day event (in contrast to the interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions). The additional percentage increase, due to the Bastille Day event, to the monthly mean values of h and ODR are 34.69 % and 50.13 % for Sat-A and 36.45 % and 68.95 % for Sat-B. These simulations confirmed (i) the dependence of atmospheric drag force on a satellite's ballistic coefficient, and (ii) that increased solar–geomagnetic activity substantially raises the degrading effect of satellite drag. In addition, the results indicate that the impact of short-duration geomagnetic transients (such as the Bastille Day storm) can have a further deleterious effect on normal satellite operations. Thus, this work increases the visibility and contributes to the scientific knowledge surrounding the Bastille Day event and also motivates the introduction of new indices used to describe and estimate the atmospheric drag effect when comparing regimes of varying solar–geomagnetic activity. We suggest that a model of satellite drag, when combined with a high-fidelity atmospheric specification as was done here, can lead to improved satellite ephemeris estimates.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference61 articles.
1. Ambelu, T., Falayi, E. O., Elemo, E. O., and Oladosu, O.: Estimation of total solar irradiance from sunspot number, Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ., 5, 741–745, available at: http://www.lajpe.org/dec11/LAJPE_576_Ambelu_Tebabal_prreprint_corr.pdf (last access: 25 March 2020), 2011. a 2. Ben-Yaacov, O., Edlerman, E., and Gurfil, P.: Analytical technique for satellite projected cross-sectional area calculation, Adv. Space Res., 56, 205–217, 2015. a 3. Bhatnagar, V. P., Germany, G. A., and Tan, A.: Satellite ballistic coefficients and the lower thermosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021627, 2005. a 4. Bobrinsky, N. and Del Monte, L.: The Space Situational Awareness Program of the European Space Agency, Cosmic Res.+, 48, 392–398, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952510050035, 2010. a 5. Borovsky, J. E. and Denton, M. H.: Differences between CME‐driven storms and CIR‐driven storms, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A07S08, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011447, 2006. a
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|