The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and global-scale tropical waves in Aeolus wind observations, radiosonde data, and reanalyses
-
Published:2023-08-29
Issue:16
Volume:23
Page:9549-9583
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Ern ManfredORCID, Diallo Mohamadou A.ORCID, Khordakova Dina, Krisch IsabellORCID, Preusse Peter, Reitebuch OliverORCID, Ungermann JörnORCID, Riese MartinORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) of the stratospheric tropical winds
influences the global circulation over a wide range of latitudes and altitudes.
Although it has strong effects on surface weather and climate, climate models
have great difficulties in simulating a realistic QBO, especially in the lower stratosphere.
Therefore, global wind observations in the tropical upper troposphere
and lower stratosphere (UTLS) are of particular interest for
investigating the QBO and the tropical waves
that contribute significantly to its driving.
In our work, we focus on the years 2018–2022 and
investigate the QBO and different
tropical wave modes in the UTLS region using global
wind observations made by the Aeolus satellite instrument and three meteorological reanalyses: the fifth generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA-5), the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55)
of the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), and the
Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2
(MERRA-2).
Further, we compare these data with observations of selected radiosonde
stations.
By comparison with Aeolus observations, we find that, on zonal average, the QBO in the lower stratosphere is well represented in all three reanalyses,
with ERA-5 performing best.
Averaged over the years 2018–2022, agreement between Aeolus and the reanalyses
is better than 1 to 2 m s−1, with somewhat larger
differences during some periods.
Differently from zonal averages, radiosonde stations provide only local observations and are therefore biased by global-scale
tropical waves, which limits their use as a QBO standard.
While reanalyses perform well on zonal average, there can be considerable
local biases between reanalyses and radiosondes.
We also find that, in the tropical UTLS, zonal wind variances of
stationary waves and the most prominent global-scale traveling
equatorial wave modes, such as Kelvin waves, Rossby-gravity waves, and
equatorial Rossby waves, are in good agreement
between Aeolus and all three reanalyses
(in most cases better than 20 % of the peak values in the UTLS).
On zonal average, this supports the use of reanalyses as a reference
for comparison with free-running climate models,
while locally, certain biases exist, particularly in the QBO wind shear zones and around the 2019–2020 QBO disruption.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft International Space Science Institute
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference152 articles.
1. Alexander, M. J. and Ortland, D. A.:
Equatorial waves in High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) data,
J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014782, 2010. a 2. Alexander, S. P., Tsuda, T., Kawatani, Y., and Takahashi, M.:
Global distribution of atmospheric waves in the equatorial
upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: COSMIC observations of
wave mean flow interactions,
J. Geophys. Res., 113, D24115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010039, 2008. a 3. Angell, J. K. and Korshover, J.:
Quasi-biennial variations in temperature, total ozone, and tropopause height,
J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 479–492, 1964. a 4. Anstey, J. A. and Shepherd, T. G.:
High-latitude influence of the quasi-biennial oscillation,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2132,
2014. a 5. Anstey, J. A., Osprey, S. M., Alexander, M. J., Baldwin, M. P.,
Butchart, N., Gray, L., Kawatani, Y., Newman, P. A., and Richter, J. H.:
Impacts, processes and projections of the quasi-biennial oscillation,
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 588–603,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00323-7, 2022. a
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|