Abstract
Abstract. The two-parameter Weibull distribution has garnered much attention
in the assessment of wind energy potential. The estimation of the shape and
scale parameters of the distribution has brought forth a successful tool for
the wind energy industry. However, it may be inappropriate to use the
two-parameter Weibull distribution to assess energy at every location,
especially at sites where low wind speeds are frequent, such as in tropical
regions. In this work, a robust technique for wind resource assessment using
a Bayesian approach for estimating Weibull parameters is first proposed.
Secondly, the wind resource assessment techniques using a two-parameter
Weibull distribution and a three-parameter Weibull distribution, which is a
generalized form of two-parameter Weibull distribution, are compared.
Simulation studies confirm that the Bayesian approach seems a more robust
technique for accurate estimation of Weibull parameters. The research is
conducted using data from seven sites in the tropical region from 1∘ N of
the Equator to 21∘ S of the Equator. Results reveal that a three-parameter
Weibull distribution with a non-zero shift parameter is a better fit for the
wind data with a higher percentage of low wind speeds (0–1 m s−1) and
low skewness. However, wind data with a smaller percentage of low wind
speeds and high skewness showed better results with a two-parameter
distribution that is a special case of the three-parameter Weibull distribution
with a zero shift parameter. The proposed distribution can be incorporated into
commercial software like WAsP to improve the accuracy of wind resource
assessments. The results also demonstrate that the proposed Bayesian
approach and application of a three-parameter Weibull distribution are
extremely useful for accurate estimation of wind power density.
Funder
Korea International Cooperation Agency
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference44 articles.
1. Ahmed, M. R.: Sample Data for Pentecost, Rakiraki and Rarotonga (Appendix 3), http://repository.usp.ac.fj/id/eprint/14126 (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.
2. Aukitino, T., Khan, M. G. M, and Ahmed, M. R.: Wind energy resource
assessment for Kiribati with a comparison of different methods of
determining Weibull parameters, Energ. Convers. Manage., 151,
641–660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.027, 2017.
3. Azad, A. K., Rasul, M. G., and Yusaf, T.: Statistical diagnosis of the Best
Weibull methods for wind power assessment for agricultural applications,
Energies, 7, 3056–3085, https://doi.org/10.3390/en7053056, 2014.
4. Carta, J. A., Ramirez, P., and Velazquez, S.: A review of wind speed
probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the
Canary Islands, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13, 933–955,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.05.005, 2009.
5. Casella, G. and Berger, R. L.: Statistical inference, 2nd edn., Cengage Learning,
ISBN 978-0-534-24312-8, 2020.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献