Uncertainty quantification of flood mitigation predictions and implications for decision making

Author:

Berends Koen D.ORCID,Straatsma Menno W.ORCID,Warmink Jord J.ORCID,Hulscher Suzanne J. M. H.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract. Reduction of water levels during river floods is key in preventing damage and loss of life. Computer models are used to design ways to achieve this and assist in the decision making process. However, the predictions of computer models are inherently uncertain, and it is currently unknown to what extent that uncertainty affects predictions of flood mitigation strategies. In this study, we quantify the uncertainty of flood mitigation interventions on the Dutch River Waal, based on 39 different sources of uncertainty and twelve intervention designs. The aim of each intervention is to reduce flood water levels. Our objective is to investigate the uncertainty of model predictions of intervention effect and to establish relationships to aid in decision making. We show that the uncertainty of an intervention can be adequately described by the newly introduced relative uncertainty metric, defined as the ratio between the confidence interval and the expected effect. Using this metric, we show that intervention effect uncertainty behaves like a traditional backwater curve with a constant relative uncertainty value. In general, we observe that uncertainty scales with effect: high flood level decreases have high uncertainty and conversely, small effects are accompanied by small uncertainties. However, different interventions with the same expected effect do not necessarily have the same uncertainty. For example, our results show that the large-scale but relatively ineffective intervention of floodplain smoothing by removing vegetation, has much higher uncertainty compared to alternative options. Finally, we show that for a defined standard of acceptable uncertainty, interventions need to be over-designed to meet this standard, and by how much. In general, we conclude that the uncertainty of model predictions is not large enough to invalidate model-based decision making, nor small enough to neglect altogether. Instead, uncertainty information can be used to improve intervention design and enrich the decision making process.

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3