Global CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes estimated from GOSAT retrievals of total column CO<sub>2</sub>
-
Published:2013-09-03
Issue:17
Volume:13
Page:8695-8717
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Basu S.ORCID, Guerlet S., Butz A., Houweling S.ORCID, Hasekamp O., Aben I., Krummel P.ORCID, Steele P., Langenfelds R., Torn M., Biraud S.ORCID, Stephens B.ORCID, Andrews A., Worthy D.
Abstract
Abstract. We present one of the first estimates of the global distribution of CO2 surface fluxes using total column CO2 measurements retrieved by the SRON-KIT RemoTeC algorithm from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). We derive optimized fluxes from June 2009 to December 2010. We estimate fluxes from surface CO2 measurements to use as baselines for comparing GOSAT data-derived fluxes. Assimilating only GOSAT data, we can reproduce the observed CO2 time series at surface and TCCON sites in the tropics and the northern extra-tropics. In contrast, in the southern extra-tropics GOSAT XCO2 leads to enhanced seasonal cycle amplitudes compared to independent measurements, and we identify it as the result of a land–sea bias in our GOSAT XCO2 retrievals. A bias correction in the form of a global offset between GOSAT land and sea pixels in a joint inversion of satellite and surface measurements of CO2 yields plausible global flux estimates which are more tightly constrained than in an inversion using surface CO2 data alone. We show that assimilating the bias-corrected GOSAT data on top of surface CO2 data (a) reduces the estimated global land sink of CO2, and (b) shifts the terrestrial net uptake of carbon from the tropics to the extra-tropics. It is concluded that while GOSAT total column CO2 provide useful constraints for source–sink inversions, small spatiotemporal biases – beyond what can be detected using current validation techniques – have serious consequences for optimized fluxes, even aggregated over continental scales.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference71 articles.
1. Basu, S., Houweling, S., Peters, W., Sweeney, C., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., Patra, P. K., Saito, R., Chevallier, F., Niwa, Y., Matsueda, H., and Sawa, Y.: The seasonal cycle amplitude of total column CO2: Factors behind the model-observation mismatch, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D23306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016124, 2011. 2. Beardsmode, D. J. and Pearman, G. I.: Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in the Australian region: data from surface observatories, Tellus B, 39B, 42–66, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.1987.tb00269.x, 1987. 3. Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Smith, J. R., Sweeney, C., Riley, W. J., and Tans, P. P.: A multi-year record of airborne CO2 observations in the US Southern Great Plains, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 751–763, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-751-2013, 2013. 4. Blasing, T. J., Broniak, C. T., and Marland, G.: Estimates of monthly carbon dioxide emissions and associated δ13C values from fossil-fuel consumption in the U.S.A. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Tech. rep., Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/ffe.001, last access: 30 November 2012. 5. Boden, T. A., Marland, G., and Andres, R. J.: Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions, Tech. rep., Oak Ridge, Tennessee, https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2010, last access: 30 November 2012.
Cited by
199 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|