Multiwavelength aerosol lidars at the Maïdo supersite, Réunion Island, France: instrument description, data processing chain, and quality assessment
-
Published:2024-09-13
Issue:9
Volume:16
Page:4137-4159
-
ISSN:1866-3516
-
Container-title:Earth System Science Data
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Sci. Data
Author:
Gantois Dominique, Payen Guillaume, Sicard MichaëlORCID, Duflot Valentin, Bègue Nelson, Marquestaut Nicolas, Portafaix Thierry, Godin-Beekmann SophieORCID, Hernandez Patrick, Golubic Eric
Abstract
Abstract. Understanding optical and radiative properties of aerosols and clouds is critical to reducing uncertainties in climate models. For over 10 years, the Observatory of Atmospheric Physics in Reunion (OPAR; 21.079° S, 55.383° E) has been operating three active lidar instruments, named lidar 1200 (Li1200), stratospheric ozone lidar (LiO3S), and tropospheric ozone lidar (LiO3T), providing time series of vertical profiles from 3 to 45 km of the aerosol extinction and backscatter coefficients at 355 and 532 nm as well as the linear depolarization ratio at 532 nm. This work provides a full technical description of the three systems, the details about the methods chosen for the signal preprocessing and processing, and an uncertainty analysis. About 1737 nighttime averaged profiles were manually screened to provide cloud-free and artifact-free profiles. Data processing consisted of Klett inversion to retrieve aerosol optical products from preprocessed files. The measurement frequency was lower during the wet season and the holiday periods. There is a good correlation between the Li1200 and LiO3S instruments in terms of stratospheric aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 355 nm (0.001–0.107; R=0.92±0.01) and with LiO3T in terms of Ångström exponent 355/532 (0.079–1.288; R=0.90±0.13). The lowest values of the averaged uncertainty in the aerosol backscatter coefficient for the three time series are 64.4 ± 31.6 % for LiO3S, 50.3 ± 29.0 % for Li1200, and 69.1 ± 42.7 % for LiO3T. These relative uncertainties are high for the three instruments because of the very low values of extinction and backscatter coefficients for background aerosols above Maïdo observatory. Uncertainty increases due to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decrease above 25 km for LIO3S and Li1200 and above 20 km for LiO3T. The lidar ratio (LR) is responsible for an uncertainty increase below 18 km (10 km) for LiO3S and Li1200 (LiO3T). LiO3S is the most stable instrument at 355 nm due to fewer technical modifications and fewer misalignments. Li1200 is a valuable addition meant to fill in the gaps in the LiO3S time series at 355 nm or for specific case studies about the middle and low troposphere. Data described in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.26171/rwcm-q370 (Gantois et al., 2024).
Funder
European Commission Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Université de La Réunion Centre national d'études spatiales Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference41 articles.
1. Alexander, L., Allen, S., Bindoff, N., Breon, F.-M., Church, J., Cubasch, U., Emori, S., Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Gillett, N., Gregory, J., Hartmann, D., Jansen, E., Kirtman, B., Knutti, R., Kanikicharla, K., Lemke, P., Marotzke, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., and Xie, S.-P.: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis, in contribution of Working Group I (WGI) to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in: Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266208027 (last access: 9 September 2024), 2013. 2. Ansmann, A., Riebesell, M., and Weitkamp, C.: Measurement of atmospheric aerosol extinction profiles with a Raman lidar, Opt. Lett., 15, 746, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.15.000746, 1990. 3. Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Riebesell, M., Weitkamp, C., and Michaelis, W.: Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar, Appl. Opt., 31, 7113, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.007113, 1992. 4. Baray, J.-L., Courcoux, Y., Keckhut, P., Portafaix, T., Tulet, P., Cammas, J.-P., Hauchecorne, A., Godin Beekmann, S., De Mazière, M., Hermans, C., Desmet, F., Sellegri, K., Colomb, A., Ramonet, M., Sciare, J., Vuillemin, C., Hoareau, C., Dionisi, D., Duflot, V., Vérèmes, H., Porteneuve, J., Gabarrot, F., Gaudo, T., Metzger, J.-M., Payen, G., Leclair de Bellevue, J., Barthe, C., Posny, F., Ricaud, P., Abchiche, A., and Delmas, R.: Maïdo observatory: a new high-altitude station facility at Reunion Island (21° S, 55° E) for long-term atmospheric remote sensing and in situ measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2865–2877, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2865-2013, 2013. 5. Baron, A., Chazette, P., Khaykin, S., Payen, G., Marquestaut, N., Bègue, N., and Duflot, V.: Early Evolution of the Stratospheric Aerosol Plume Following the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Eruption: Lidar Observations From Reunion (21° S, 55° E), Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2022GL101751, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101751, 2023.
|
|