FABM-NflexPD 2.0: testing an instantaneous acclimation approach for modeling the implications of phytoplankton eco-physiology for the carbon and nutrient cycles
-
Published:2023-01-04
Issue:1
Volume:16
Page:95-108
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Kerimoglu OnurORCID, Pahlow Markus, Anugerahanti PrimaORCID, Smith Sherwood Lan
Abstract
Abstract. The acclimative response of phytoplankton, which adjusts their nutrient and pigment content in response to changes in ambient light, nutrient levels, and temperature, is an important determinant of observed chlorophyll distributions and biogeochemistry. Acclimative models typically capture this response and its impact on the C : nutrient : Chl ratios of phytoplankton by explicitly resolving the dynamics of these constituents of phytoplankton biomass. The instantaneous acclimation (IA) approach only requires resolving the dynamics of a single tracer and calculates the elemental composition assuming instantaneous local equilibrium. IA can capture the acclimative response without substantial loss of accuracy in both 0D box models and spatially explicit 1D models. A major drawback of IA so far has been its inability to maintain mass balance for the elements with unresolved dynamics. Here we extend the IA model to capture both C and N cycles in a 0D setup, which requires analytical derivation of additional flux terms to account for the temporal changes in cellular N quota, Q. We present extensive tests of this model, with regard to the conservation of total C an N and its behavior in comparison to an otherwise equivalent, fully explicit dynamic acclimation (DA) variant under idealized conditions with variable light and temperature. We also demonstrate a modular implementation of this model in the Framework for Aquatic Biogeochemical Modelling (FABM), which facilitates modeling competition between an arbitrary number of different acclimative phytoplankton types. In a 0D setup, we did not find evidence for computational advantages of the IA approach over the DA variant. In a spatially explicit setup, performance gains may be possible but would require modifying the physical-flux calculations to account for spatial differences in Q between model grid cells.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference44 articles.
1. Anugerahanti, P., Kerimoglu, O., and Smith, S. L.: Enhancing Ocean
Biogeochemical Models With Phytoplankton Variable Composition,
Front. Mar. Sci., 8, 675428, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.675428, 2021. a 2. Arrigo, K. R.: Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles, Nature, 437,
343–348, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04158, 2005. a 3. Ayata, S. D., Lévy, M., Aumont, O., Sciandra, A., Sainte-Marie, J.,
Tagliabue, A., and Bernard, O.: Phytoplankton growth formulation in marine
ecosystem models: Should we take into account photo-acclimation and variable
stoichiometry in oligotrophic areas?, J. Marine Syst., 125,
29–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.12.010, 2013. a 4. Bonachela, J. A., Allison, S. D., Martiny, A. C., and Levin, S. A.: A model for variable phytoplankton stoichiometry based on cell protein regulation, Biogeosciences, 10, 4341–4356, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4341-2013, 2013. a 5. Bonachela, J. A., Klausmeier, C. A., Edwards, K. F., Litchman, E., and Levin,
S. A.: The role of phytoplankton diversity in the emergent oceanic
stoichiometry, J. Plankton Res., 38, 1021–1035,
https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbv087, 2016. a
|
|