Statistical modelling of air quality impacts from individual forest fires in New South Wales, Australia
-
Published:2022-12-20
Issue:12
Volume:22
Page:4039-4062
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Storey Michael A.ORCID, Price Owen F.
Abstract
Abstract. Wildfires and hazard reduction burns produce
smoke that contains pollutants including particulate matter. Particulate
matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5) is harmful to human health, potentially causing cardiovascular and respiratory issues that can lead to premature deaths. PM2.5 levels depend on environmental conditions, fire behaviour and smoke dispersal patterns. Fire management agencies need to understand and predict PM2.5 levels associated with a particular fire so that pollution warnings can be sent to communities and/or hazard reduction burns can be timed to avoid the worst conditions for PM2.5 pollution. We modelled PM2.5, measured at air quality stations in New South Wales
(Australia) from ∼ 1400 d when individual fires were
burning near air quality stations, as a function of fire and weather
variables. Using Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) satellite hotspots, we identified days when one fire was burning within 150 km of at least 1 of 48 air quality stations. We extracted ERA5 gridded weather data and daily active fire area estimates
from the hotspots for our modelling. We created random forest models for
afternoon, night and morning PM2.5 levels to understand drivers of
and predict PM2.5. Fire area and boundary layer height were important predictors across the
models, with temperature, wind speed and relative humidity also being important.
There was a strong increase in PM2.5 with decreasing distance, with a
sharp increase when the fire was within 20 km. The models improve our
understanding of the drivers of PM2.5 from individual fires and
demonstrate a promising approach to PM2.5 model development. However,
although the models predicted well overall, there were several large
under-predictions of PM2.5 that mean further model development would be required for the models to be deployed operationally.
Funder
NSW Department of Planning,Industry and Environment
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference56 articles.
1. Biau, G. and Scornet, E.: A random forest guided tour, TEST, 25, 197–227, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7, 2016. 2. Boer, M. M., Resco de Dios, V., and Bradstock, R. A.: Unprecedented burn
area of Australian mega forest fires, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 171–172,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0716-1, 2020. 3. Borchers-Arriagada, N., Bowman, D. M. J. S., Price, O., Palmer, A. J.,
Samson, S., Clarke, H., Sepulveda, G., and Johnston, F. H.: Smoke health
costs and the calculus for wildfires fuel management: a modelling study,
Lancet Planetary Health, 5, e608–e619,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00198-4, 2021. 4. Bradshaw, S. D., Dixon, K. W., Lambers, H., Cross, A. T., Bailey, J., and
Hopper, S. D.: Understanding the long-term impact of prescribed burning in
mediterranean-climate biodiversity hotspots, with a focus on south-western
Australia, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 27, 643–657,
https://doi.org/10.1071/wf18067, 2018. 5. Broome, R. A., Johnstone, F. H., Horsley, J., and Morgan, G. G.: A rapid
assessment of the impact of hazard reduction burning around Sydney, May
2016, Med. J. Australia, 205, 407–408, https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00895, 2016.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|