Education, financial aid, and awareness can reduce smallholder farmers' vulnerability to drought under climate change
-
Published:2022-04-07
Issue:4
Volume:22
Page:1201-1232
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Wens Marthe L. K.ORCID, van Loon Anne F.ORCID, Veldkamp Ted I. E., Aerts Jeroen C. J. H.
Abstract
Abstract. Analyses of future agricultural drought impacts require a multidisciplinary approach in which both human and environmental dynamics are studied. In this study, we used the socio-hydrologic, agent-based drought risk adaptation model ADOPT. This model simulates the decisions of smallholder farmers regarding on-farm drought adaptation measures and the resulting dynamics in household vulnerability and drought impact over time. We applied ADOPT to assess the effect of four top-down disaster risk reduction interventions on smallholder farmers' drought risk in the Kenyan drylands: the robustness of additional extension services, lowered credit rates, ex ante rather than ex post cash transfers, and improved early warnings were evaluated under different climate change scenarios. Model results suggest that extension services increase the adoption of newer low-cost drought adaptation measures while credit schemes are useful
for measures with a high investment cost, and ex ante cash transfers allow
the least wealthy households to adopt low-cost, well-known measures. Early
warning systems are shown to be more effective in climate scenarios with less frequent
droughts. Combining all four interventions displays a mutually reinforcing
effect with a sharp increase in the adoption of on-farm drought adaptation
measures, resulting in reduced food insecurity, decreased poverty levels, and
drastically lower need for emergency aid, even under hotter and drier
climate conditions. These nonlinear synergies indicate that a holistic
perspective is needed to support smallholder resilience in the Kenyan
drylands.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference152 articles.
1. Adamtey, N., Musyoka, M. W., Zundel, C., Cobo, J. G., Karanja, E., Fiaboe, K. K. M., Muriuki, A., Mucheru-Muna, M., Vanlauwe, B., Berset, E., Messmer, M. M., Gattinger, A., Bhullar, G. S., Cadisch, G., Fliessbach, A., Mäder, P., Niggli, U., and Foster, D.: Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 235, 61–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.001, 2016. 2. Adger, W. N.: Vulnerability, Global Environ. Change, 16, 268–281,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006, 2006. 3. Aerts, J. C. J. H. J. H., Botzen, W. J., Clarke, K. C., Cutter, S. L., Hall, J. W., Merz, B., Michel-Kerjan, E., Mysiak, J., Surminski, S., and Kunreuther, H.: Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 193–199, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1, 2018. 4. Ailliot, P., Allard, D., Monbet, V., Naveau, P., Ailliot, P., Allard, D.,
Monbet, V., and Naveau, P.: Stochastic weather generators: an overview of
weather type models Titre: Générateurs stochastiques de condition
météorologiques: une revue des modèles à type de temps, J.
la Société Française Stat., 156, 101–113, 2015. 5. Aker, J. C.: Dial “A” for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries, Agric. Econ., 42, 631–647, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x, 2011.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|