Arctic cloud annual cycle biases in climate models
-
Published:2019-07-10
Issue:13
Volume:19
Page:8759-8782
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Taylor Patrick C., Boeke Robyn C.ORCID, Li Ying, Thompson David W. J.
Abstract
Abstract. Arctic clouds exhibit a robust annual cycle with maximum
cloudiness in fall and minimum cloudiness in winter. These variations affect energy
flows in the Arctic with a large influence on the surface radiative fluxes.
Contemporary climate models struggle to reproduce the observed Arctic cloud
amount annual cycle and significantly disagree with each other. The goal of
this analysis is to quantify the cloud-influencing factors that contribute
to winter–summer cloud amount differences, as these seasons are primarily
responsible for the model discrepancies with observations. We find that
differences in the total cloud amount annual cycle are primarily caused by
differences in low, rather than high, clouds; the largest differences occur between
the surface and 950 hPa. Grouping models based on their seasonal cycles of
cloud amount and stratifying cloud amount by cloud-influencing factors, we
find that model groups disagree most under strong lower tropospheric
stability, weak to moderate mid-tropospheric subsidence, and cold lower
tropospheric air temperatures. Intergroup differences in low cloud amount
are found to be a function of lower tropospheric thermodynamic
characteristics. Further, we find that models with a larger low cloud amount
in winter have a larger ice condensate fraction, whereas models with a
larger low cloud amount in summer have a smaller ice condensate fraction.
Stratifying model output by the specifics of the cloud microphysical scheme
reveals that models treating cloud ice and liquid condensate as separate
prognostic variables simulate a larger ice condensate fraction than those
that treat total cloud condensate as a prognostic variable and use a
temperature-dependent phase partitioning. Thus, the cloud microphysical
parameterization is the primary cause of inter-model differences in the
Arctic cloud annual cycle, providing further evidence of the important role
that cloud ice microphysical processes play in the evolution and modeling of
the Arctic climate system.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Barton, N. P., Klein, S. A., Boyle, J. S., and Zhang, Y. Y.: Arctic synoptic
regimes: Comparing domain-wide Arctic cloud observations with CAM4 and CAM5
during similar dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017589, 2012. 2. Beesley, J. A. and Moritz, R. E.: Toward an Explanation of the Annual Cycle
of Cloudiness over the Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 12, 395–415,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0395:TAEOTA>2.0.CO;2,
1999. 3. Boeke, R. C. and Taylor, P. C.: Evaluation of the Arctic surface radiation
budget in CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 2016JD025099,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025099, 2016. 4. Boer, G., de Morrison, H., Shupe, M. D., and Hildner, R.: Evidence of liquid
dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface
remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L01803,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046016, 2011. 5. Cesana, G., Kay, J. E., Chepfer, H., English, J. M., and de Boer, G.:
Ubiquitous low-level liquid-containing Arctic clouds: New observations and
climate model constraints from CALIPSO-GOCCP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,
L20804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053385, 2012.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|