Synoptic evaluation of carbon cycling in Beaufort Sea during summer: contrasting river inputs, ecosystem metabolism and air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes
Author:
Forest A.ORCID, Coupel P., Else B., Nahavandian S., Lansard B., Raimbault P., Papakyriakou T., Gratton Y., Fortier L., Tremblay J.-É., Babin M.
Abstract
Abstract. The accelerated decline in Arctic sea ice combined with an ongoing trend toward a more dynamic atmosphere is modifying carbon cycling in the Arctic Ocean. A critical issue is to understand how net community production (NCP; the balance between gross primary production and community respiration) responds to changes and modulates air–sea CO2 fluxes. Using data collected as part of the ArcticNet-Malina 2009 expedition in southeastern Beaufort Sea (Arctic Ocean), we synthesize information on sea ice, wind, river, water column properties, metabolism of the planktonic food web, organic carbon fluxes and pools, as well as air–sea CO2 exchange, with the aim of identifying indices of ecosystem response to environmental changes. Data were analyzed to develop a non-steady-state carbon budget and an assessment of NCP against air–sea CO2 fluxes. The mean atmospheric forcing was a mild upwelling-favorable wind (~5 km h−1) blowing from the N-E and a decaying ice cover (<80% concentration) was observed beyond the shelf, the latter being fully exposed to the atmosphere. We detected some areas where the surface mixed layer was net autotrophic owing to high rates of primary production (PP), but the ecosystem was overall net heterotrophic. The region acted nonetheless as a sink for atmospheric CO2 with a mean uptake rate of −2.0 ± 3.3 mmol C m−2d−1. We attribute this discrepancy to: (1) elevated PP rates (>600 mg C m−2d−1) over the shelf prior to our survey, (2) freshwater dilution by river runoff and ice melt, and (3) the presence of cold surface waters offshore. Only the Mackenzie River delta and localized shelf areas directly affected by upwelling were identified as substantial sources of CO2 to the atmosphere (>10mmol C m−2d−1). Although generally <100 mg C m−2d−1, daily PP rates cumulated to a total PP of ~437.6 × 103 t C, which was roughly twice higher than the organic carbon delivery by river inputs (~241.2 × 103 t C). Subsurface PP represented 37.4% of total PP for the whole area and as much as ~72.0% seaward of the shelf break. In the upper 100 m, bacteria dominated (54%) total community respiration (~250 mg C m−2d−1), whereas protozoans, metazoans, and benthos, contributed to 24%, 10%, and 12%, respectively. The range of production-to-biomass ratios of bacteria was wide (1–27% d−1), while we estimated a narrower range for protozoans (6–11% d−1) and metazoans (1–3 % d−1). Over the shelf, benthic biomass was twice higher (~5.9 g C m−2) than the biomass of pelagic heterotrophs (~2.4 g C m−2), in accord with high vertical carbon fluxes on the shelf (956 ± 129 mg C m−2d−1). Threshold PP (PP at which NCP becomes positive) in the surface layer oscillated from 20–152 mg C m−2d−1, with a pattern from low-to-high values as the distance from the Mackenzie River decreased. We conclude that: (1) climate change is exacerbating the already extreme biological gradient across the Arctic shelf-basin system; (2) the Mackenzie Shelf acts as a weak sink for atmospheric CO2, implying that PP exceeds the respiration of terrigenous and marine organic matter in the surface layer; and (3) shelf break upwelling can transfer CO2 to the atmosphere, but massive outgassing can be attenuated if nutrients brought also by upwelling support diatom production. Our study underscores that cross-shelf exchange of waters, nutrients and particles is a key mechanism that needs to be properly monitored as the Arctic transits to a new state.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference131 articles.
1. Anderson, L. G., Tanhua, T., Björk, G., Hjalmarsson, S., Jones, E., Jutterström, S., Rudels, B., Swift, J. H., and Wahlstöm, I.: Arctic ocean shelf-basin interaction: An active continental shelf CO2 pump and its impact on the degree of calcium carbonate solubility, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, % 57, 869–879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.012, 2010. 2. Ardyna, M., Babin, M., Gosselin, M., Devred, E., Bélanger, S., Matsuoka, A., and Tremblay, J.-É.: Parameterization of vertical chlorophyll a in the Arctic Ocean: impact of the subsurface chlorophyll maximum on regional, seasonal, and annual primary production estimates, Biogeosciences, 10, 4383–4404, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4383-2013, 2013. 3. Barber, D. G. and Hanesiak, J. M.: Meteorological forcing of sea ice concentrations in the southern Beaufort Sea over the period 1979 to 2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, % 109, C06014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc002027, 2004. 4. Bates, N. R., Moran, S. B., Hansell, D. A., and Mathis, J. T.: An increasing CO2 sink in the Arctic Ocean due to sea-ice loss, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23609, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl027028, 2006. 5. Bélanger, S., Babin, M., and Tremblay, J.-É.: Increasing cloudiness in Arctic damps the increase in phytoplankton primary production due to sea ice receding, Biogeosciences, 10, 4087–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4087-2013, 2013.
|
|