An adjoint-free algorithm for conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations (CNOPs) via sampling
-
Published:2023-07-06
Issue:3
Volume:30
Page:263-276
-
ISSN:1607-7946
-
Container-title:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nonlin. Processes Geophys.
Abstract
Abstract. In this paper, we propose a sampling algorithm based on state-of-the-art statistical machine learning techniques to obtain conditional nonlinear
optimal perturbations (CNOPs), which is different from traditional (deterministic) optimization methods.1 Specifically, the traditional approach is unavailable in practice, which requires numerically computing the gradient (first-order
information) such that the computation cost is expensive, since it needs a large number of times to run numerical models. However, the sampling
approach directly reduces the gradient to the objective function value (zeroth-order information), which also avoids using the adjoint technique
that is unusable for many atmosphere and ocean models and requires large amounts of storage. We show an intuitive analysis for the sampling
algorithm from the law of large numbers and further present a Chernoff-type concentration inequality to rigorously characterize the degree to which
the sample average probabilistically approximates the exact gradient. The experiments are implemented to obtain the CNOPs for two numerical models,
the Burgers equation with small viscosity and the Lorenz-96 model. We demonstrate the CNOPs obtained with their spatial patterns, objective values,
computation times, and nonlinear error growth. Compared with the performance of the three approaches, all the characters for quantifying the CNOPs
are nearly consistent, while the computation time using the sampling approach with fewer samples is much shorter. In other words, the new
sampling algorithm shortens the computation time to the utmost at the cost of losing little accuracy.
Funder
Chinese Academy of Sciences National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference55 articles.
1. Barclay, A., Gill, P. E., and Ben Rosen, J.:
SQP methods and their application to numerical optimal control, in: Variational calculus, optimal control and applications, edited by: Schmidt, W. H., Heier, K., Bittner, L., and Bulirsch, R., Birkhäuser, Basel, 207–222, Print ISBN 978-3-0348-9780-8,
Online ISBN 978-3-0348-8802-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8802-8_21,
1998. a 2. Birgin, E. G., Martínez, J. M., and Raydan, M.:
Nonmonotone spectral projected gradient methods on convex sets, SIAM J. Optimiz., 10, 1196–1211, 2000. a, b 3. Bottou, L., Curtis, F. E., and Nocedal, J.:
Optimization methods for large-scale machine learning, SIAM Rev., 60, 223–311, 2018. a 4. Buizza, R. and Palmer, T. N.:
The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1434–1456, 1995. a 5. Chen, L., Duan, W., and Xu, H.:
A SVD-based ensemble projection algorithm for calculating the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation, Sci. China Earth Sci., 58, 385–394, 2015. a, b
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|