Investigating rough single-fracture permeabilities with persistent homology
-
Published:2024-03-13
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:353-365
-
ISSN:1869-9529
-
Container-title:Solid Earth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Solid Earth
Author:
Fuchs MarcoORCID, Suzuki AnnaORCID, Hasumi Togo, Blum PhilippORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The permeability of rock fractures is a crucial parameter for flow processes in the subsurface. In the last few decades, different methods were developed to investigate on permeability in fractures, such as flow-through experiments, numerical flow simulations, or empirical equations. In recent years, the topological method of persistent homology was also used to estimate the permeability of fracture networks and porous rocks but not for rough single fractures yet. Hence, we apply persistent homology analysis on a decimetre-scale, rough sandstone bedding joint. To investigate the influence of roughness, three different data sets are created to perform the analysis: (1) 200 µm, (2) 100 µm, and (3) 50 µm resolutions. All estimated permeabilities were then compared to values derived by experimental air permeameter measurements and numerical flow simulation. The results reveal that persistent homology analysis is able to estimate the permeability of a single fracture, even if it tends to slightly overestimate permeabilities compared to conventional methods. Previous studies using porous media showed the same overestimation trend. Furthermore, the expenditure of time for persistent homology analysis, as well as air permeameter measurements and numerical flow simulation, was compared, which showed that persistent homology analysis can be also an acceptable alternative method.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ACT-X
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference80 articles.
1. Alqahtani, N. J., Chung, T., Da Wang, Y., Armstrong, R. T., Swietojanski, P., and Mostaghimi, P.: Flow-Based Characterization of Digital Rock Images Using Deep Learning, SPE J., 26, 1800–1811, https://doi.org/10.2118/205376-PA, 2021. 2. Anderson, T. I., Guan, K. M., Vega, B., Aryana, S. A., and Kovscek, A. R.: RockFlow: Fast Generation of Synthetic Source Rock Images Using Generative Flow Models, Energies, 13, 6571, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246571, 2020. 3. Andrew, M., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J.: Pore-scale imaging of trapped supercritical carbon dioxide in sandstones and carbonates, International J. Greenh. Gas Contr., 22, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.018, 2014. 4. Araya-Polo, M., Alpak, F. O., Hunter, S., Hofmann, R., and Saxena, N.: Deep learning–driven permeability estimation from 2D images, Comput. Geosci., 24, 571–580, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09886-9, 2020. 5. Barton, N. and de Quadros, E. F.: Joint aperture and roughness in the prediction of flow and groutability of rock masses, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 34, 252.e1–252.e14, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00081-6, 1997.
|
|