Technical note: Interferences of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on methane concentration measurements
-
Published:2019-09-04
Issue:17
Volume:16
Page:3319-3332
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Kohl LukasORCID, Koskinen MarkkuORCID, Rissanen Kaisa, Haikarainen Iikka, Polvinen Tatu, Hellén HeidiORCID, Pihlatie MariORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Studies that quantify plant methane (CH4) emission rely on the accurate measurement of small changes in the mixing ratio
of CH4 that coincide with much larger changes in the mixing ratio of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Here, we assessed whether 11 commonly occurring VOCs (e.g. methanol, α- and β-pinene, Δ3-carene) interfered with the quantitation
of CH4 by five laser-absorption spectroscopy and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) based CH4 analysers, and quantified the interference of seven compounds on three instruments. Our results showed minimal interference with laser-based analysers and underlined the importance of identifying and compensating for interferences with FTIR instruments. When VOCs were not included in the spectral library, they exerted a strong bias on FTIR-based instruments (64–1800 ppbv apparent CH4 ppmv−1 VOC).
Minor (0.7–126 ppbv ppmv−1)
interference with FTIR-based measurements were also detected when the spectrum of the interfering VOC was included in the library. In contrast, we detected only minor (<20 ppbv ppmv−1)
and transient (< 1 min) VOC interferences on laser-absorption spectroscopy-based analysers.
Overall, our results demonstrate that VOC interferences have only minor effects on CH4 flux measurements in soil chambers, but may severely impact stem and shoot flux measurements. Laser-absorption-based instruments are better suited for quantifying CH4 fluxes from plant leaves and stems than FTIR-based instruments; however, significant interferences in shoot chamber measurements could not be excluded for any of the tested instruments. Our results furthermore showed that FTIR can precisely quantify VOC mixing ratios and could therefore provide a method complementary to proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS).
Funder
European Research Council Biotieteiden ja Ympäristön Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference35 articles.
1. Aaltonen, H., Aalto, J., Kolari, P., Pihlatie, M., Pumpanen, J., Kulmala, M.,
Nikinmaa, E., Vesala, T., and Bäck, J.: Continuous VOC flux
measurements on boreal forest floor, Plant Soil, 369, 241–256,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1553-4, 2013. a 2. Assan, S., Baudic, A., Guemri, A., Ciais, P., Gros, V., and Vogel, F. R.: Characterization of interferences to in situ observations of δ13CH4 and C2H6 when using a cavity ring-down spectrometer at industrial sites, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2077–2091, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2077-2017, 2017. a 3. Carmichael, M. J., Bernhardt, E. S., Bräuer, S. L., and Smith, W. K.:
The role of vegetation in methane flux to the atmosphere: Should vegetation
be included as a distinct category in the global methane budget?,
Biogeochemistry, 119, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-9974-1, 2014. a 4. Covey, K. R. and Megonigal, J. P.: Methane production and emissions in trees
and forests, New Phytologist, 222, 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15624, 2019. a 5. Etiope, G.: Detecting and Measuring Gas Seepage, in: Natural Gas Seepage, pp.
63–84, Springer International Publishing, Cham,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14601-0_4, 2015. a
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|