Soil moisture and matric potential – an open field comparison of sensor systems
-
Published:2020-03-23
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:683-697
-
ISSN:1866-3516
-
Container-title:Earth System Science Data
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Sci. Data
Author:
Jackisch ConradORCID, Germer Kai, Graeff Thomas, Andrä Ines, Schulz KatrinORCID, Schiedung MarcusORCID, Haller-Jans Jaqueline, Schneider Jonas, Jaquemotte Julia, Helmer Philipp, Lotz Leander, Bauer Andreas, Hahn Irene, Šanda MartinORCID, Kumpan Monika, Dorner Johann, de Rooij GerritORCID, Wessel-Bothe Stefan, Kottmann Lorenz, Schittenhelm Siegfried, Durner Wolfgang
Abstract
Abstract. Soil water content and matric potential are central hydrological state variables. A large variety of automated probes and sensor systems for state monitoring exist and are frequently applied. Most applications solely rely on the calibration by the manufacturers. Until now, there has been no commonly agreed-upon calibration procedure. Moreover, several opinions about the capabilities and reliabilities of specific sensing methods or sensor systems exist and compete. A consortium of several institutions conducted a comparison study of currently available sensor systems for soil water content and matric potential under field conditions. All probes were installed at 0.2 m b.s. (metres below surface), following best-practice procedures. We present the set-up and the recorded data of 58 probes of 15 different systems measuring soil moisture and 50 further probes of 14 different systems for matric potential. We briefly discuss the limited coherence of the measurements in a cross-correlation analysis. The measuring campaign was conducted during the growing period of 2016. The monitoring data, results from pedophysical analyses of the soil and laboratory reference measurements for calibration are published in Jackisch et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.892319).
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference28 articles.
1. Bakker, G., van der Ploeg, M. J., de Rooij, G. H., Hoogendam, C. W., Gooren, H. P. A., Huiskes, C., Koopal, L. K., and Kruidhof, H.: New Polymer
Tensiometers: Measuring Matric Pressures Down to the Wilting Point, Vadose Zone J., 6, 196–202, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0110, 2007. a 2. Bogena, H. R., Huisman, J. A., Schilling, B., Weuthen, A., and Vereecken, H.:
Effective Calibration of Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors, Sensors, 17, 208, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010208, 2017. a, b 3. Buckingham, E.: Studies on the movement of soil moisture, Bulletin (United
States. Bureau of Soils) No. 38, Washington,
availble at: http://www.worldcat.org/title/studies-on-the-movement-of-soil-moisture/oclc/29749917 (last access: 10 December 2019),
1907. a 4. Chow, L., Xing, Z., Rees, H. W., Meng, F., Monteith, J., and Lionel, S.: Field
Performance of Nine Soil Water Content Sensors on a Sandy Loam Soil in New
Brunswick, Maritime Region, Canada, Sensors, 9, 9398–9413,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s91109398, 2009. a 5. Chudobiak, W. J., Syrett, B. A., and Hafez, H. M.: Recent Advances in
Broad-Band VHF and UHF Transmission Line Methods for Moisture Content and
Dielectric Constant Measurement, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measure., 28, 284–289, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.1979.4314833, 1979. a
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|