Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment
-
Published:2014-07-30
Issue:7
Volume:18
Page:2735-2772
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Hall J.ORCID, Arheimer B.ORCID, Borga M., Brázdil R., Claps P., Kiss A., Kjeldsen T. R., Kriaučiūnienė J., Kundzewicz Z. W., Lang M.ORCID, Llasat M. C.ORCID, Macdonald N., McIntyre N., Mediero L.ORCID, Merz B.ORCID, Merz R.ORCID, Molnar P.ORCID, Montanari A.ORCID, Neuhold C., Parajka J.ORCID, Perdigão R. A. P.ORCID, Plavcová L., Rogger M., Salinas J. L.ORCID, Sauquet E.ORCID, Schär C.ORCID, Szolgay J., Viglione A.ORCID, Blöschl G.
Abstract
Abstract. There is growing concern that flooding is becoming more frequent and severe in Europe. A better understanding of flood regime changes and their drivers is therefore needed. The paper reviews the current knowledge on flood regime changes in European rivers that has traditionally been obtained through two alternative research approaches. The first approach is the data-based detection of changes in observed flood events. Current methods are reviewed together with their challenges and opportunities. For example, observation biases, the merging of different data sources and accounting for nonlinear drivers and responses. The second approach consists of modelled scenarios of future floods. Challenges and opportunities associated with flood change scenarios are discussed such as fully accounting for uncertainties in the modelling cascade and feedbacks. To make progress in flood change research, we suggest that a synthesis of these two approaches is needed. This can be achieved by focusing on long duration records and flood-rich and flood-poor periods rather than on short duration flood trends only, by formally attributing causes of observed flood changes, by validating scenarios against observed flood regime dynamics, and by developing low-dimensional models of flood changes and feedbacks. The paper finishes with a call for a joint European flood change research network.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference347 articles.
1. Abarbanel, H. D. I.: Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data, Springer, New York, 272 pp., 1996. 2. Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S. P.: System dynamics modeling of reservoir operations for flood management, J. Comput. Civil. Eng., 14, 190–198, 2000. 3. Alcrudo, F.: A state of the art review on mathematical modelling of flood propagation, First IMPACT project Workshop, Wallingford, UK, available at: http://www.impact-project.net/cd/papers/print/008_pr_02-05-16_IMPACT_Alcrudo.pdf (last access: December 2013), 2002. 4. Allamano, P., Claps, P., and Laio, F.: Global warming increases flood risk in mountainous areas, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L24404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041395, 2009. 5. Amponsah, W., Borga, M., Marchi, L., Boni, G., Cavalli, M., Comiti, F., Crema, S., Ana, L., Marra, F., and Zoccatelli, D.: The flash flood of October 2011 in the Magra River basin (Italy): rainstorm characterisation and flood response analysis, J. Hydrometeorol., in review, 2014.
Cited by
447 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|