In situ cloud ground-based measurements in the Finnish sub-Arctic: intercomparison of three cloud spectrometer setups
-
Published:2020-09-29
Issue:9
Volume:13
Page:5129-5147
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Doulgeris Konstantinos-MatthaiosORCID, Komppula Mika, Romakkaniemi SamiORCID, Hyvärinen Antti-Pekka, Kerminen Veli-MattiORCID, Brus DavidORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Continuous, semi-long-term, ground-based in situ cloud
measurements were conducted during the Pallas Cloud Experiment (PaCE) in
2013. The measurements were carried out in Finnish sub-Arctic region at
Sammaltunturi station (67∘58′ N, 24∘07′ E; 560 m a.s.l.), part of Pallas
Atmosphere – Ecosystem Supersite and Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW)
program. The main motivation of the campaign was to conduct in situ cloud
measurements with three different cloud spectrometer probes and perform an
evaluation of their ground-based setups. Therefore, we mutually compared the
performance of the cloud and aerosol spectrometer (CAS), the cloud droplet probe (CDP) and the forward-scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP-100) (DMT;
Boulder, CO, USA). We investigated how different meteorological parameters
affect each instrument's ground-based setup operation and
quantified possible biases and discrepancies of different microphysical
cloud properties. Based on the obtained results we suggested limitations for
further use of the instrument setups in campaigns where the focus is on
investigating aerosol–cloud interactions. Measurements in this study were
made by instruments owned by the Finnish Meteorological Institute and results
concern their operation in sub-Arctic conditions with frequently occurring
supercooled clouds. The measured parameter from each instrument was the size distribution, and
additionally we derived the number concentration, the effective diameter,
the median volume diameter and the liquid water content. A complete
intercomparison between the CAS probe and the FSSP-100 ground setups and
additionally between the FSSP-100 and the CDP probe ground setups was made
and presented. Unfortunately, there was not a sufficient amount of common data
to compare all three probes together due to operational problems of the CDP
ground setup in sub-zero conditions. The CAS probe that was fixed to one
direction lost a significant number of cloud droplets when the wind direction
was out of wind iso-axial conditions in comparison with the FSSP-100 and the
CDP, which were both placed on a rotating platform. We revealed that CAS and
FSSP-100 had good agreement in deriving sizing parameters (effective
diameter and median volume diameter from 5 to 35 µm) even though CAS
was losing a significant amount of cloud droplets. The most sensitive
derived parameter was liquid water content, which was strongly connected to
the wind direction and temperature.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council Academy of Finland NordForsk Koneen Säätiö
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference72 articles.
1. Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness,
Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. 2. Anttila, T., Vaattovaara, P., Komppula, M., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Lihavainen, H., Kerminen, V.-M., and Laaksonen, A.: Size-dependent activation of aerosols into cloud droplets at a subarctic background site during the second Pallas Cloud Experiment (2nd PaCE): method development and data evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4841–4854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4841-2009, 2009. 3. Anttila, T., Brus, D., Jaatinen, A., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Kivekäs, N., Romakkaniemi, S., Komppula, M., and Lihavainen, H.: Relationships between particles, cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet activation during the third Pallas Cloud Experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11435–11450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11435-2012, 2012. 4. Baumgardner, D.: An analysis and comparison of five water droplet measuring
instruments, J. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 891–910,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<0891:AAACOF>2.0.CO;2, 1983. 5. Baumgardner, D. and Spowart, M.: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering
Spectrometer Probe. Part III: Time Response and Laser Imhomogeneity
Limitations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 7, 666–672,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0666:EOTFSS>2.0.CO;2 1990.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|