Two typical merging events of oceanic mesoscale anticyclonic eddies
-
Published:2019-11-25
Issue:6
Volume:15
Page:1545-1559
-
ISSN:1812-0792
-
Container-title:Ocean Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ocean Sci.
Author:
Wang Zi-Fei, Sun LiangORCID, Li Qiu-Yang, Cheng Hao
Abstract
Abstract. The long-term theoretical “energy paradox” of whether
the final state of two merging anticyclones contains more energy than the
initial state is studied by considering two typical merging events of ocean
mesoscale eddies. The results demonstrate that the total mass (volume),
total circulation (area integration of vorticity), and total angular
momentum (AM) are conserved if the orbital AM relative to the center of mass
is taken into account as the eddies rotate around the center of mass before
merging. For subsurface merging, the mass trapped by the Taylor–Proudman
effect above the subsurface eddies should also be included. Both
conservation laws of circulation and orbital AM have been overlooked in
previous theoretical studies. As a result of fusion during merging, the
total eddy kinetic energy decreases slightly. In contrast, the total
eddy potential energy (EPE) increases after merging. The increase in EPE is
mostly supported by the loss of gravitational potential energy (PE) via eddy
sinking below the original level prior to merging. This implies that the
merging of eddies requires background gravitational PE to be converted to
EPE. In contrast, the vorticity and enstrophy consequently decrease after
merging. Thus, the eddy merging effect behaves as a “large-scale energy
pump” in an inverse energy cascade. It is noted that eddy conservation and
conversion laws depend on the laws of physical dynamics, even if additional
degrees of freedom can be provided in a mathematical model.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Cell Biology,Developmental Biology,Embryology,Anatomy
Reference56 articles.
1. Amores, A., Jordà, G., Arsouze, T., and Le Sommer, J.: Up to what extent can we
characterize ocean eddies using present-day gridded altimetric products?,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 7220–7236, 2018. 2. Assassi, C., Morel, Y., Vandermeirsch, F., Chaigneau, A., Pegliasco, C., Morrow, R., Colas, R., Fleury, S., Carton, X., and Klein, P.: An index to distinguish
surface-and subsurface-intensified vortices from surface observations,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 2529–2552, 2016. 3. Ballarotta, M., Ubelmann, C., Pujol, M.-I., Taburet, G., Fournier, F., Legeais, J.-F., Faugère, Y., Delepoulle, A., Chelton, D., Dibarboure, G., and Picot, N.: On the resolutions of ocean altimetry maps, Ocean Sci., 15, 1091–1109, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1091-2019, 2019. 4. Bashmachnikov, I. L., Sokolovskiy, M. A., Belonenko, T. V., Volkov, D. L., Isachsen, P. E., and Carton, X.: On the vertical
structure and stability of the Lofoten vortex in the Norwegian Sea, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 128, 1–27, 2017. 5. Behringer, D. W. and Xue, Y.: Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation
system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean[C]//Proc. Eighth Symp. on Integrated
Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface,
Seattle, Wash: AMS 84th Annual Meeting, Washington State Convention and
Trade Center, 11–15 January 2004 (data available at: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.godas.html, last access: 18 November 2019).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|