MIdASv0.2.1 – MultI-scale bias AdjuStment
-
Published:2022-08-05
Issue:15
Volume:15
Page:6165-6180
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Berg PeterORCID, Bosshard Thomas, Yang WeiORCID, Zimmermann KlausORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Bias adjustment is the practice of statistically transforming climate model data in order to reduce systematic deviations from a reference data set, typically some sort of observations.
There are numerous proposed methodologies to perform the adjustments – ranging from simple scaling approaches to advanced multi-variate distribution-based mapping.
In practice, the actual bias adjustment method is a small step in the application, and most of the processing handles reading, writing, and linking different data sets.
These practical processing steps become especially heavy with increasing model domain size and resolution in both time and space.
Here, we present a new implementation platform for bias adjustment, which we call MIdAS (MultI-scale bias AdjuStment).
MIdAS is a modern code implementation that supports features such as modern Python libraries that allow efficient processing of large data sets at computing clusters, state-of-the-art bias adjustment methods based on quantile mapping, and “day-of-year-based” adjustments to avoid artificial discontinuities, and it also introduces cascade adjustment in time and space.
The MIdAS platform has been set up such that it will continually support development of methods aimed towards higher-resolution climate model data, explicitly targeting cases where there is a scale mismatch between data sets.
The paper presents a comparison of different quantile-mapping-based bias adjustment methods and the subsequently chosen code implementation for MIdAS.
A current recommended setup of the MIdAS bias adjustment is presented and evaluated in a pseudo-reference setup for regions around the world.
Special focus is put on preservation of trends in future climate projections, and it is shown that the cascade adjustments perform better than the standard quantile mapping implementations and are often similar to methods that explicitly preserve trends.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut Horizon 2020
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference54 articles.
1. Berg, P., Feldmann, H., and Panitz, H.-J.: Bias correction of high resolution
regional climate model data, J. Hydrol., 448–449, 80–92,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.026, 2012. a 2. Berg, P., Bosshard, T., and Yang, W.: Model Consistent Pseudo-Observations of
Precipitation and Their Use for Bias Correcting Regional Climate Models,
Climate, 3, 118–132, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli3010118, 2015. a, b 3. Berg, P., Almén, F., and Bozhinova, D.: HydroGFD3.0 (Hydrological Global Forcing Data): a 25 km global precipitation and temperature data set updated in near-real time, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1531–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1531-2021, 2021a. a 4. Berg P., Bosshard, T., Yang, W., and Zimmermann, K.:
MIdAS version 0.1: framtagande och utvärdering av ett nytt verktyg för biasjustering,
SMHI, 63, KLIMATOLOGI, ISSN 1654-2258, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1578567/FULLTEXT01.pdf (last access: 1 August 2022), 2021b. a 5. Berg, P., Bosshard, T., Yang, W., and Zimmermann, K.: MIdAS (MultI-scale bias AdjuStment),
Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6624233, 2022a. a
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|