Understanding the surface temperature response and its uncertainty to CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, black carbon, and sulfate
-
Published:2021-10-08
Issue:19
Volume:21
Page:14941-14958
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Nordling KalleORCID, Korhonen HanneleORCID, Räisänen JouniORCID, Partanen Antti-IlariORCID, Samset Bjørn H., Merikanto JoonasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Understanding the regional surface temperature responses
to different anthropogenic climate forcing agents, such as greenhouse gases
and aerosols, is crucial for understanding past and future regional climate
changes. In modern climate models, the regional temperature responses vary
greatly for all major forcing agents, but the causes of this variability are
poorly understood. Here, we analyze how changes in atmospheric and oceanic
energy fluxes due to perturbations in different anthropogenic climate
forcing agents lead to changes in global and regional surface temperatures.
We use climate model data on idealized perturbations in four major
anthropogenic climate forcing agents (CO2, CH4, sulfate, and
black carbon aerosols) from Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP) climate experiments for six climate
models (CanESM2, HadGEM2-ES, NCAR-CESM1-CAM4, NorESM1, MIROC-SPRINTARS,
GISS-E2). Particularly, we decompose the regional energy budget
contributions to the surface temperature responses due to changes in
longwave and shortwave fluxes under clear-sky and cloudy conditions, surface
albedo changes, and oceanic and atmospheric energy transport. We also
analyze the regional model-to-model temperature response spread due to each
of these components. The global surface temperature response stems from
changes in longwave emissivity for greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4)
and mainly from changes in shortwave clear-sky fluxes for aerosols (sulfate
and black carbon). The global surface temperature response normalized by
effective radiative forcing is nearly the same for all forcing agents (0.63,
0.54, 0.57, 0.61 K W−1 m2). While the main physical processes
driving global temperature responses vary between forcing agents, for all
forcing agents the model-to-model spread in temperature responses is
dominated by differences in modeled changes in longwave clear-sky
emissivity. Furthermore, in polar regions for all forcing agents the
differences in surface albedo change is a key contributor to temperature
responses and its spread. For black carbon, the modeled differences in
temperature response due to shortwave clear-sky radiation are also important
in the Arctic. Regional model-to-model differences due to changes in
shortwave and longwave cloud radiative effect strongly modulate each other.
For aerosols, clouds play a major role in the model spread of regional
surface temperature responses. In regions with strong aerosol forcing, the
model-to-model differences arise from shortwave clear-sky responses and are
strongly modulated by combined temperature responses to oceanic and
atmospheric heat transport in the models.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council Academy of Finland
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Forcing,
feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate
models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–7, 2012. 2. Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J. F., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Denman, K. L.,
Flato, G. M., Kharin, V., Lee, W., and Merryfield, W. J.: Carbon emission
limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of
greenhouse gases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 2011. 3. Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013. 4. Block, K. and Mauritsen, T.: Forcing and feedback in the MPI-ESM-LR coupled
model under abruptly quadrupled CO2, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5,
676–691, 2013. 5. Cess, H. R. D.: Stratospheric aerosols: Effect upon atmospheric temperature
and global climate, Tellus, 28, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v28i1.10188,
1976.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|