Development of Indian summer monsoon precipitation biases in two seasonal forecasting systems and their response to large-scale drivers
-
Published:2024-04-30
Issue:2
Volume:5
Page:671-702
-
ISSN:2698-4016
-
Container-title:Weather and Climate Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Weather Clim. Dynam.
Author:
Keane Richard J., Srivastava AnkurORCID, Martin Gill M.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Met Office Global Coupled Model (GC) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System (CFSv2) are both widely used for predicting and simulating the Indian summer monsoon (ISM), and previous studies have demonstrated similarities in the biases in both systems at a range of timescales from weather forecasting to climate simulation. In this study, ISM biases are studied in seasonal forecasting setups of the two systems in order to provide insight into how they develop across timescales. Similarities are found in the development of the biases between the two systems, with an initial reduction in precipitation followed by a recovery associated with an increasingly cyclonic wind field to the north-east of India. However, this occurs on longer timescales in CFSv2, with a much stronger recovery followed by a second reduction associated with sea surface temperature (SST) biases so that the bias at longer lead times is of a similar magnitude to that in GC. In GC, the precipitation bias is almost fully developed within a lead time of just 8 d, suggesting that carrying out simulations with short time integrations may be sufficient for obtaining substantial insight into the biases in much longer simulations. The relationship between the precipitation and SST biases in GC seems to be more complex than in CFSv2 and differs between the early part of the monsoon season and the later part of the monsoon season. The relationship of the bias with large-scale drivers is also investigated, using the boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation (BSISO) index as a measure of whether the large-scale dynamics favour increasing, active, decreasing or break monsoon conditions. Both models simulate decreasing conditions the best and increasing conditions the worst, in agreement with previous studies and extending these previous results to include CFSv2 and multiple BSISO cycles.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference79 articles.
1. Abhilash, S., Sahai, A. K., Borah, N., Chattopadhyay, R., Joseph, S., Sharmila, S., De, S., Goswami, B. N., and Kumar, A.: Prediction and monitoring of monsoon intraseasonal oscillations over Indian monsoon region in an ensemble prediction system using CFSv2, Clim. Dynam., 42, 2801–2815, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2045-9, 2014. 2. Arribas, A., Glover, M., Maidens, A., Peterson, K., Gordon, M., MacLachlan, C., Graham, R., Fereday, D., Camp, J., Scaife, A. A., Xavier, P., McLean, P., Colman, A., and Cusack, S.: The GloSea4 Ensemble Prediction System for Seasonal Forecasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 1891–1910, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3615.1, 2011. 3. Ashok, K., Guan, Z., and Yamagata, T.: Impact of the Indian Ocean dipole on the relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4499–4502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294, 2001. 4. Bollasina, M. and Ming, Y.: The general circulation model precipitation bias over the southwestern equatorial Indian Ocean and its implications for simulating the South Asian monsoon, Clim. Dynam., 40, 3–4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1347-7, 2012. 5. Bollasina, M. and Nigam, S.: Indian Ocean SST, evaporation, and precipitation during the South Asian summer monsoon in IPCC-AR4 coupled simulations, Clim. Dynam., 33, 1017–1032, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0477-4, 2009.
|
|