Abstract
Abstract. Since its first establishment in 2000, EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar NETwork) has been devoted to providing, through its database, exclusively quantitative aerosol properties, such as aerosol backscatter and aerosol extinction coefficients, the latter only for stations able to retrieve it independently (from Raman or High Spectral Resolution Lidars). As these coefficients are provided in terms of vertical profiles, EARLINET database must also include the details on the range resolution of the submitted data. In fact, the algorithms used in the lidar data analysis often alter the spectral content of the data, mainly working as low pass filters with the purpose of noise damping. Low pass filters are mathematically described by the Digital Signal Processing (DSP) theory as a convolution sum. As a consequence, this implies that each filter's output, at a given range (or time) in our case, will be the result of a linear combination of several lidar input data relative to different ranges (times) before and after the given range (time): a first hint of loss of resolution of the output signal. The application of filtering processes will also always distort the underlying true profile whose relevant features, like aerosol layers, will then be affected both in magnitude and in spatial extension. Thus, both the removal of noise and the spatial distortion of the true profile produce a reduction of the range resolution. This paper provides the determination of the effective resolution (ERes) of the vertical profiles of aerosol properties retrieved starting from lidar data. Large attention has been addressed to provide an assessment of the impact of low-pass filtering on the effective range resolution in the retrieval procedure.
Reference62 articles.
1. Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Riebesell, M., Weitkamp, C., and Michaelis, W.: Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar, Appl. Optics, 31, 7113–7131, 1992.
2. Backus, G. and Gilbert, F.: The resolving power of gross Earth data, Geophys. J. Int., 16, 169–205, 1968.
3. Barak, P.: Smoothing and differentiation by an adaptive-degree polynomial filter, Anal. Chem., 67, 2758–2762, 1995.
4. Bevington, P. R. and Robinson, D. K.: Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.
5. Beyerle, G. and McDermid, I. S.: Altitude range resolution of differential absorption lidar ozone profiles, Appl. Optics, 38, 924–927, 1999.