Dissolved carbon flow to particulate organic carbon enhances soil carbon sequestration
Author:
Si Qintana,Chen Kangli,Wei Bin,Zhang Yaowen,Sun Xun,Liang Junyi
Abstract
Abstract. Particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), which are two primary components of the soil carbon (C) reservoir, have different physical and chemical properties as well as biochemical turnover rates. Microbial necromass entombment is a primary mechanism for MAOC formation from fast-decaying plant substrates, whereas POC is typically considered the product of structural litter via physical fragmentation. However, emerging evidence shows that microbial by-products derived from labile C substrates can enter the POC pool. To date, it is still unclear to what extent dissolved C can enter the POC pool and how it affects the subsequent long-term soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. Our study here, through a 13C-labeling experiment in 10 soils from 5 grassland sites as well as a modeling analysis, showed that up to 12.29 % of isotope-labeled glucose C (i.e., dissolved C) was detected in the POC pool. In addition, the glucose-derived POC was correlated with 13C-MBC (microbial biomass carbon) and the fraction of clay and silt, suggesting that the flow of dissolved C to POC is dependent on interactions between soil physical and microbial processes. The modeling analysis showed that ignoring the C flow from MBC to POC significantly underestimated soil C sequestration by up to 53.52 % across the 10 soils. The results emphasize that the soil mineral-regulated microbial process, besides the plant structural residues, is a significant contributor to POC, acting as a vital component in SOC dynamics.
Funder
Chinese Universities Scientific Fund National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference41 articles.
1. Bai, Y. F. and Cotrufo, M. F.: Grassland soil carbon sequestration: Current understanding, challenges, and solutions, Science, 377, 603608, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo2380, 2022. 2. Baldock, J. A. and Skjemstad, J. O.: Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack, Org. Geochem., 31, 697–710, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6380(00)00049-8, 2000. 3. Bardgett, R. D., Bullock, J. M., Lavorel, S., Manning, P., Schaffner, U., Ostle, N., Chomel, M., Durigan, G., Fry, E. L., Johnson, D., Lavallee, J. M., Le Provost, G., Luo, S., Png, K., Sankaran, M., Hou, X. Y., Zhou, H. K., Ma, L., Ren, W. B., Li, X. L., Ding, Y., Li, Y. H., and Shi, H. X.: Combatting global grassland degradation, Nat. Rev. Earth Env., 2, 720–735, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2, 2021. 4. Basile-Doelsch, I., Balesdent, J., and Pellerin, S.: Reviews and syntheses: The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil, Biogeosciences, 17, 5223–5242, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5223-2020, 2020. 5. Benbi, D. K., Boparai, A. K., and Brar, K.: Decomposition of particulate organic matter is more sensitive to temperature than the mineral associated organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 70, 183–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.032, 2014.
|
|