MISR Research Aerosol Algorithm: refinements for dark water retrievals

Author:

Limbacher J. A.,Kahn R. A.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract. We explore systematically the cumulative effect of many assumptions made in the MISR Research Aerosol retrieval algorithm, with the aim of quantifying the main sources of bias and uncertainty over ocean, and correcting them to the extent possible. 1132 coincident, surface-based sun photometer spectral aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements are used for validation. Based on comparisons between these data and our baseline case (similar to the MISR Standard algorithm, but without the "modified linear mixing" approximation), for mid-visible AOD < 0.10, a high bias of 0.024 (0.032 for blue) is reduced by about half in the blue and green bands when (1) ocean surface under-light is included and the whitecap reflectance is increased for the red band, (2) physically based adjustments in particle microphysical properties and mixtures are made, (3) an adaptive pixel selection method is used, (4) spectral uncertainty is estimated from vicarious calibration, and (5) minor radiometric calibration changes are made for the red and NIR wavelengths. Applying (6) more stringent cloud screening (setting the maximum non-clear fraction to 0.50) brings all median spectral biases below 0.01. Large surface-modeling uncertainties preclude the use of both the blue and green MISR bands for over-ocean aerosol retrievals, even at mid-visible AOD higher than 0.2. When all adjustments are included (except more stringent cloud screening) and a modified acceptance criterion is used, the RMSE decreases for all wavelengths by 10–26% for the Research Algorithm itself, and 12–35% compared to the Version 22 MISR Standard Algorithm (SA). At mid-visible wavelengths, 86% of AOD data falls within 0.05 or 20% of validation values; 61% of blue band AOD data, and > 68% of green, red, and NIR values fall within 0.03 or 10%. For Ångström exponent (ANG): 68% of 1117 validation cases for AOD > 0.01 fall within 0.275 of the sun photometer values, compared to 49% for the SA. ANG RMSE decreases by 16% compared to the SA, and the median absolute error drops by 36%.

Funder

Goddard Space Flight Center

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An analysis of global aerosol type as retrieved by MISR;Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres;2015-05-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3