MISR Research Aerosol Algorithm: refinements for dark water retrievals
Author:
Limbacher J. A., Kahn R. A.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. We explore systematically the cumulative effect of many assumptions made in the MISR Research Aerosol retrieval algorithm, with the aim of quantifying the main sources of bias and uncertainty over ocean, and correcting them to the extent possible. 1132 coincident, surface-based sun photometer spectral aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements are used for validation. Based on comparisons between these data and our baseline case (similar to the MISR Standard algorithm, but without the "modified linear mixing" approximation), for mid-visible AOD < 0.10, a high bias of 0.024 (0.032 for blue) is reduced by about half in the blue and green bands when (1) ocean surface under-light is included and the whitecap reflectance is increased for the red band, (2) physically based adjustments in particle microphysical properties and mixtures are made, (3) an adaptive pixel selection method is used, (4) spectral uncertainty is estimated from vicarious calibration, and (5) minor radiometric calibration changes are made for the red and NIR wavelengths. Applying (6) more stringent cloud screening (setting the maximum non-clear fraction to 0.50) brings all median spectral biases below 0.01. Large surface-modeling uncertainties preclude the use of both the blue and green MISR bands for over-ocean aerosol retrievals, even at mid-visible AOD higher than 0.2. When all adjustments are included (except more stringent cloud screening) and a modified acceptance criterion is used, the RMSE decreases for all wavelengths by 10–26% for the Research Algorithm itself, and 12–35% compared to the Version 22 MISR Standard Algorithm (SA). At mid-visible wavelengths, 86% of AOD data falls within 0.05 or 20% of validation values; 61% of blue band AOD data, and > 68% of green, red, and NIR values fall within 0.03 or 10%. For Ångström exponent (ANG): 68% of 1117 validation cases for AOD > 0.01 fall within 0.275 of the sun photometer values, compared to 49% for the SA. ANG RMSE decreases by 16% compared to the SA, and the median absolute error drops by 36%.
Funder
Goddard Space Flight Center
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference37 articles.
1. Abdou, W. A., Martonchik, J. V., Kahn, R. A., West, R. A., and Diner, D. J.: A modified linear-mixing method for calculating atmospheric path radiances of aerosol mixtures, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16883–16888, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03434, 1997. 2. Antoine, D., Morel, A., Leymarie, E., Houyou, A., Gentili, B., Victori, S., Buis, J.-P., Buis, N., Meunier, S., Canini, M., Crozel, D., Fougnie, B., and Henry, P.: Underwater radiance distributions measured with miniaturized multispectral radiance cameras, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 74–95, 2013. 3. Barrot, G., Mangin, A., and Pinnock, S.: GlobColour Product User Guide, available at: http://www.globcolour.info (last access: 31 January 2014), 2010. 4. Baum, B., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A., Platnick, S., King, M., Hu, Y., and Bedka, S.: Bulk scattering properties for the remote sensing of ice clouds: Part II. Narrowband models, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1896–1911, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2309.1, 2005. 5. Bruegge, C. J., Diner, D. J., Kahn, R. A., Chrien, N., Helmlinger, M. C., Gaitley, B. J., and Abdou, W. A.: The MISR radiometric calibration process, Remote Sens. Environ., 107, 2–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.024, 2007.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. An analysis of global aerosol type as retrieved by MISR;Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres;2015-05-14
|
|