No robust evidence of future changes in major stratospheric sudden warmings: a multi-model assessment from CCMI
-
Published:2018-08-13
Issue:15
Volume:18
Page:11277-11287
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Ayarzagüena BlancaORCID, Polvani Lorenzo M.ORCID, Langematz Ulrike, Akiyoshi HideharuORCID, Bekki SlimaneORCID, Butchart Neal, Dameris Martin, Deushi Makoto, Hardiman Steven C.ORCID, Jöckel PatrickORCID, Klekociuk AndrewORCID, Marchand Marion, Michou Martine, Morgenstern OlafORCID, O'Connor Fiona M., Oman Luke D., Plummer David A.ORCID, Revell LauraORCID, Rozanov EugeneORCID, Saint-Martin DavidORCID, Scinocca John, Stenke AndreaORCID, Stone KaneORCID, Yamashita YousukeORCID, Yoshida KoheiORCID, Zeng GuangORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Major mid-winter stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) are the largest
instance of wintertime variability in the Arctic stratosphere. Because SSWs
are able to cause significant surface weather anomalies on intra-seasonal
timescales, several previous studies have focused on their potential future
change, as might be induced by anthropogenic forcings. However, a wide range
of results have been reported, from a future increase in the frequency of
SSWs to an actual decrease. Several factors might explain these contradictory
results, notably the use of different metrics for the identification of SSWs
and the impact of large climatological biases in single-model studies. To
bring some clarity, we here revisit the question of future SSW changes,
using an identical set of metrics applied consistently across 12 different
models participating in the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative. Our analysis
reveals that no statistically significant change in the frequency of SSWs
will occur over the 21st century, irrespective of the metric used for the
identification of the event. Changes in other SSW characteristics – such as
their duration, deceleration of the polar night jet, and the tropospheric
forcing – are also assessed: again, we find no evidence of future changes over
the 21st century.
Funder
Universidad Complutense de Madrid FP7 Environment
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Ayarzagüena, B., Langematz, U., Meul, S., Oberländer, S., Abalichin,
J., and Kubin, A.: The role of climate change and ozone recovery for the
future timing of major stratospheric warmings, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40,
2460–2465, 2013. 2. Baldwin, M. P. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous
weather regimes, Science, 294, 581–583, 2001. 3. Bell, C. J., Gray, L. J., and Kettleborough, J.: Changes in Northern
Hemisphere stratospheric variability under increased CO2
concentrations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1181–1190, 2010. 4. Butchart, N., Austin, J., Knight, J. R., Scaife, A. A., and Gallani, M. L.:
The response of the stratospheric climate to projected changes in the
concentrations of well-mixed greenhouse gases from 1992 to 2015, J. Climate,
13, 2142–2159, 2000. 5. Butler, A. H. and Gerber, E. P.: Optimizing the definition of a sudden
stratospheric warming, J. Climate, 31, 2337–2344, 2018.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|