New constraints on terrestrial and oceanic sources of atmospheric methanol
-
Published:2008-12-01
Issue:23
Volume:8
Page:6887-6905
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Millet D. B.,Jacob D. J.,Custer T. G.,de Gouw J. A.,Goldstein A. H.,Karl T.,Singh H. B.,Sive B. C.,Talbot R. W.,Warneke C.,Williams J.
Abstract
Abstract. We use a global 3-D chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem) to interpret new aircraft, surface, and oceanic observations of methanol in terms of the constraints that they place on the atmospheric methanol budget. Recent measurements of methanol concentrations in the ocean mixed layer (OML) imply that in situ biological production must be the main methanol source in the OML, dominating over uptake from the atmosphere. It follows that oceanic emission and uptake must be viewed as independent terms in the atmospheric methanol budget. We deduce that the marine biosphere is a large primary source (85 Tg a−1) of methanol to the atmosphere and is also a large sink (101 Tg a−1), comparable in magnitude to atmospheric oxidation by OH (88 Tg a−1). The resulting atmospheric lifetime of methanol in the model is 4.7 days. Aircraft measurements in the North American boundary layer imply that terrestrial plants are a much weaker source than presently thought, likely reflecting an overestimate of broadleaf tree emissions, and this is also generally consistent with surface measurements. We deduce a terrestrial plant source of 80 Tg a−1, comparable in magnitude to the ocean source. The aircraft measurements show a strong correlation with CO (R2=0.51−0.61) over North America during summer. We reproduce this correlation and slope in the model with the reduced plant source, which also confirms that the anthropogenic source of methanol must be small. Our reduced plant source also provides a better simulation of methanol observations over tropical South America.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference97 articles.
1. Asher, W.: The sea-surface microlayer and its effect on global air-sea gas transfer, in: The Sea Surface and Global Change, edited by: Peter, S. L. and Robert, A. D., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997. 2. Atlas, E. L., Ridley, B. A., and Cantrell, C. A.: The Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) experiment: Introduction, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8353, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003172, 2003. 3. Bertschi, I., Yokelson, R. J., Ward, D. E., Babbitt, R. E., Susott, R. A., Goode, J. G., and Hao, W. M.: Trace gas and particle emissions from fires in large diameter and belowground biomass fuels, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8472, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002100, 2003. 4. Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q. B., Liu, H. G. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23 073–23 095, 2001. 5. Carpenter, L. J., Lewis, A. C., Hopkins, J. R., Read, K. A., Longley, I. D., and Gallagher, M. W.: Uptake of methanol to the North Atlantic Ocean surface, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002294, 2004.
Cited by
154 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|