Stream laws in analog tectonic-landscape models
-
Published:2023-08-02
Issue:4
Volume:11
Page:731-740
-
ISSN:2196-632X
-
Container-title:Earth Surface Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Surf. Dynam.
Author:
Reitano RiccardoORCID, Clementucci RomanoORCID, Conrad Ethan M.ORCID, Corbi Fabio, Lanari Riccardo, Faccenna ClaudioORCID, Bazzucchi ChiaraORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The interplay between tectonics and surface processes defines the evolution of mountain belts. However, correlating these processes through the evolution of natural orogens represents a scientific challenge. Analog models can be used for analyzing and interpreting the effect of such interaction. To fulfill this purpose it is necessary to understand how the imposed boundary conditions affect analog models' evolution in time and space. We use nine analog models characterized by different combinations of imposed regional slope and rainfall rates to investigate how surface processes respond to the presence of tectonically built topography (imposed slope) under different climatic conditions (rainfall rate). We show how the combination of these parameters controls the development of drainage networks and erosional processes. We quantify the morphological differences between experimental landscapes in terms of a proposed Se/R ratio, accounting for both observables and boundary conditions. We find few differences between analog models and natural prototypes in terms of parametrization of the detachment-limited stream power law. We observe a threshold in the development of channelization, modulated by a tradeoff between applied boundary conditions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Geophysics
Reference50 articles.
1. Bonnet, S.: Shrinking and splitting of drainage basins in orogenic landscapes
from the migration of the main drainage divide, Nat. Geosci., 2, 766–771, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo666, 2009. a 2. Bonnet, S. and Crave, A.: Landscape response to climate change: Insights from
experimental modeling and implications for tectonic versus climatic uplift of
topography, Geology, 31, 123–126,
https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0123:LRTCCI>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a 3. Burbank, D. W. and Anderson, R. S.: Tectonic Geomorphology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345063, 2011. a 4. Clementucci, R., Ballato, P., Siame, L. L., Faccenna, C., Yaaqoub, A., Essaifi, A., Leanni, L., and Guillou, V.: Lithological control on topographic relief evolution in a slow tectonic setting (Anti-Atlas, Morocco), Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 596, 117788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117788, 2022. a, b, c, d, e 5. Cyr, A. J., Granger, D. E., Olivetti, V., and Molin, P.: Quantifying rock
uplift rates using channel steepness and cosmogenic nuclide–determined
erosion rates: Examples from northern and southern Italy, Lithosphere, 2,
188–198, https://doi.org/10.1130/L96.1, 2010. a
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|