Abstract
Abstract. In conditions of unavoidably increasing mutual ignorance among human
geographers about each others' areas of expertise, the question of how to
pursue dialogue in a mutually respectful way that promotes insight and
learning is ever more pressing. The dialogue between Carolin Schurr and
Peter Weichhart in Kiel in 2019 offers instructive examples of how this
issue can be addressed. The first, shorter part of the contribution is
devoted to the substantive question of the unity of geographic inquiry,
which was the subject matter of the dialogue. The bulk of the discussion,
however, is devoted to analysing the dynamics of the dialogue itself, with a special focus on the sometimes very subtle and unintended ways in which
positionalities leave their mark.
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference14 articles.
1. Duden: Steckenpferd, online aufrufbar:
https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Steckenpferd, letzter Zugriff:
23. Juli 2020.
2. Hannah, M.: Direction and Socio-Spatial Theory: A Political Economy of Oriented Practice, Routledge, London, 2019.
3. Jessop, B., Brenner, N., and Jones, M.: Theorizing sociospatial relations,
Environ. Plan. D, 26, 389–401, 2008.
4. McDowell, L.: Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in
Human Geography, Trans. Inst. Brit. Geogr., 17, 399–416, 1992.
5. Nystuen, J.: Identification of some fundamental spatial concepts, in: Human Geography: An Anthology, edited by: Agnew, J., Livingstone, D., and Rodgers, A., Blackwell, Oxford, 590–599, 1996 [1963].
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献