Abstract
Abstract. The archetype of a cycle has played an essential role in explaining observations of nature over thousands of years. At present, this perception significantly influences the worldview of modern societies, including several areas of science. In the Earth sciences, the concept of cyclicity offers simple analytical solutions in the face of complex events and their respective products, in both time and space. Current stratigraphic research integrates several methods to identify repetitive patterns in the stratigraphic record and to interpret oscillatory geological processes. This essay proposes a historical review of the cyclic conceptions from the earliest phases in the Earth sciences to their subsequent evolution into current stratigraphic principles and practices, contributing to identifying opportunities in integrating methodologies and developing future research mainly associated with quantitative approaches.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference192 articles.
1. Abels, H. A., Kraus, M. J., and Gingerich, P. D.: Precession-scale cyclicity in the fluvial lower Eocene Willwood Formation of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming (USA), Sedimentology, 60, 1467–1483, https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12039, 2013.
2. Adhémar: Révolutions de la Mer: Déluges périodiques, 440 pp.,1860.
3. Agassiz, L.: Études Sur Les Glaciers, Cambridge University Press, 363 pp., ISBN 9781108049764, 2012.
4. Ager, D. V.: The new catastrophism: the importance of the rare event in geological history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 231 pp., ISBN 0521483581, 1993.
5. Allen, J. R. L.: Asymmetrical ripple marks and the origin of water-laid Cosets of Cross-Strata, Geol. J., 3, 187–236, https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3350030201, 1962.