The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network
-
Published:2019-08-02
Issue:15
Volume:19
Page:9797-9831
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Crowell SeanORCID, Baker David, Schuh Andrew, Basu SourishORCID, Jacobson Andrew R., Chevallier FredericORCID, Liu Junjie, Deng FengORCID, Feng Liang, McKain KathrynORCID, Chatterjee AbhishekORCID, Miller John B.ORCID, Stephens Britton B.ORCID, Eldering AnnmarieORCID, Crisp DavidORCID, Schimel DavidORCID, Nassar RayORCID, O'Dell Christopher W., Oda Tomohiro, Sweeney ColmORCID, Palmer Paul I.ORCID, Jones Dylan B. A.
Abstract
Abstract. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 has been on orbit since 2014, and its global coverage holds the potential to reveal new information about the carbon cycle through the use of top-down atmospheric inversion methods combined with column average CO2 retrievals. We employ a large ensemble of atmospheric inversions utilizing different transport models, data assimilation techniques, and prior flux distributions in order to quantify the satellite-informed fluxes from OCO-2 Version 7r land observations and their uncertainties at continental scales. Additionally, we use in situ measurements to provide a baseline against which to compare the satellite-constrained results. We find that within the ensemble spread, in situ observations, and satellite retrievals constrain a similar global total carbon sink of 3.7±0.5 PgC yr−1, and 1.5±0.6 PgC yr−1 for global land, for the 2015–2016 annual mean. This agreement breaks down in smaller regions, and we discuss the differences between the experiments. Of particular interest is the difference between the different assimilation constraints in the tropics, with the largest differences occurring in tropical Africa, which could be an indication of the global perturbation from the 2015–2016 El Niño. Evaluation of posterior concentrations using TCCON and aircraft observations gives some limited insight into the quality of the different assimilation constraints, but the lack of such data in the tropics inhibits our ability to make strong conclusions there.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference112 articles.
1. Baker, D., Law, R., Gurney, K., Rayner, P., Peylin, P., Denning, A., Bousquet,
P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y., Ciais, P., Fung, I., Heimann, M., John, J.,
Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Masarie, K., Prather, M., Pak, B., Taguchi, S., and
Zhu, Z.: TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model
errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006a. a, b, c 2. Baker, D. F., Doney, S. C., and Schimel, D. S.: Variational data assimilation
for atmospheric CO2, Tellus, 58B, 359–365, 2006b. a 3. Baker, D. F., Bösch, H., Doney, S. C., O'Brien, D., and Schimel, D. S.: Carbon source/sink information provided by column CO2 measurements from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4145–4165, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4145-2010, 2010. a 4. Ballantyne, A. P., Alden, C. B., Miller, J. B., Tans, P. P., and White, J.
W. C.: Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans
during the past 50 years, Nature, 488, 70–72,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11299, 2012. a 5. Basu, S., Guerlet, S., Butz, A., Houweling, S., Hasekamp, O., Aben, I., Krummel, P., Steele, P., Langenfelds, R., Torn, M., Biraud, S., Stephens, B., Andrews, A., and Worthy, D.: Global CO2 fluxes estimated from GOSAT retrievals of total column CO2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8695–8717, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8695-2013, 2013. a, b
Cited by
128 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|