The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog
-
Published:2018-08-27
Issue:8
Volume:11
Page:4883-4890
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Jayaratne Rohan, Liu Xiaoting, Thai Phong, Dunbabin Matthew, Morawska LidiaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. While low-cost particle sensors are increasingly being
used in numerous applications, most of them have no heater or dryer at the
inlet to remove water from the sample before measurement. Deliquescent
growth of particles and the formation of fog droplets in the atmosphere can
lead to significant increases in particle number concentration (PNC) and
mass concentrations reported by such sensors. We carried out a detailed
study using a Plantower PMS1003 low-cost particle sensor, both in the
laboratory and under actual ambient field conditions, to investigate its
response to increasing humidity and the presence of fog in the air. We found
significant increases in particle number and mass concentrations at relative
humidity above about 75 %. During a period of fog, the total PNC increased
by 28 %, while the PNC larger than 2.5 µm increased by over 50 %.
The PM10 concentration reported by the PMS1003 was 46 % greater than
that on the standard monitor with a charcoal dryer at the inlet. While there
is a causal link between particle pollution and adverse health effects, the
presence of water on the particles is not harmful to humans. Therefore, air
quality standards for particles are specifically limited to solid particles
and standard particle monitoring instruments are fitted with a heater or
dryer at the inlet to remove all liquid material from the sample before the
concentrations are measured. This study shows that it is important to
understand that the results provided by low-cost particle sensors, such as
the PMS1003, cannot be used to ascertain if air quality standards are being
met.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference23 articles.
1. Alexandrova, O. A., Boyer, D. L., Anderson, J. R., and Fernando, H. J. S.: The
influence of thermally driven circulation on PM10 concentration in the
Salt Lake Valley, Atmos. Environ., 37, 421–437, 2003. 2. Charron, A., Harrison, R. M., Moorcroft, S., and Booker, J.: Quantitative
interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by
TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmos. Environ., 38,
415–423, 2004. 3. Crilley, L. R., Shaw, M., Pound, R., Kramer, L. J., Price, R., Young, S., Lewis, A. C., and Pope, F. D.: Evaluation of a
low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 709–720,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018, 2018. 4. Fine, G. F., Cavanagh, L. M., Afonja, A., and Binions, R.: Metal
Oxide Semi-Conductor Gas Sensors in Environmental Monitoring, Sensors, 10, 5469–5502, 2010. 5. Hänel, G.: Computation of the extinction of visible radiation by
atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of the relative humidity, based
upon measured properties, J. Aerosol Sci., 3, 377–386, 1972.
Cited by
225 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|