Estimation of groundwater age distributions from hydrochemistry: comparison of two metamodelling algorithms in the Heretaunga Plains aquifer system, New Zealand
-
Published:2023-12-06
Issue:23
Volume:27
Page:4295-4316
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Tschritter ConnyORCID, Daughney Christopher J., Karalliyadda Sapthala, Hemmings Brioch, Morgenstern UweORCID, Moore Catherine
Abstract
Abstract. Groundwater age or residence time is important for identifying flow and contaminant pathways through groundwater systems. Typically, groundwater age and age distributions are inferred via lumped parameter models based on measured age tracer concentrations. However, due to cost and time constraints, age tracers are usually only sampled at a small percentage of the wells in a catchment. This paper describes and compares two methods to increase the number of groundwater age data points and assist with validating age distributions inferred from lumped parameter models. Two machine learning techniques with different strengths were applied to develop two independent metamodels that each aim to establish relationships between the hydrochemical parameters and the modelled groundwater age distributions in one test catchment. Ensemble medians from the best model realisations per age distribution percentile were used for comparison with the results from traditional lumped parameter models based on age tracers. Results show that both metamodelling techniques predict age distributions from hydrochemistry with good correspondence to traditional lumped parameter model (LPM)-derived age distributions. Therefore, these techniques can be used to assist with the interpretation of lumped parameter models where age tracers have been sampled, and they can also be applied to predict groundwater age distributions for wells in a similar hydrogeological regime that have hydrochemistry data available but no age tracer data.
Funder
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference81 articles.
1. Abrams, D. and Haitjema, H.: How aquifer characteristics of a watershed affect transit time distributions of groundwater, Groundwater, 56, 517–520, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12788, 2018. 2. Asher, M. J., Croke, B. F. W., Jakeman, A. J., and Peeters, L. J. M.: A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5957–5973, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016967, 2015. 3. Beanland, S., Melhuish, A., Nicol, A., and Ravens, J.: Structure and deformational history of the inner forearc region, Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand, NZ J. Geol. Geophys., 41, 325–342, https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1998.9514814, 1998. 4. Begg, J. G., Jones, K. E., Lee, J. M., and Tschritter, C.: 3D geological model of the Napier-Hastings urban area [explanatory text], GNS Science geological map 7b, GNS Science, Lower Hutt, NZ, p. 21, https://doi.org/10.21420/JJEC-J652, 2022. 5. Beyer, M., Jackson, B., Daughney, C., Morgenstern, U., and Norton, K.: Use of hydrochemistry as a standalone and complementary groundwater age tracer, J. Hydrol., 543, 127–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.062, 2016.
|
|