Shyft v4.8: a framework for uncertainty assessment and distributed hydrologic modeling for operational hydrology
-
Published:2021-02-05
Issue:2
Volume:14
Page:821-842
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Burkhart John F.ORCID, Matt Felix N., Helset Sigbjørn, Sultan Abdella Yisak, Skavhaug Ola, Silantyeva OlgaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. This paper presents Shyft, a novel hydrologic modeling software for streamflow forecasting
targeted for use in hydropower production environments and research. The software enables
rapid development and implementation in operational settings and the capability to perform
distributed hydrologic modeling with multiple model and forcing configurations. Multiple models
may be built up through the creation of hydrologic algorithms from a library of well-known
routines or through the creation of new routines, each defined for processes such as
evapotranspiration, snow accumulation and melt, and soil water response. Key to the design of
Shyft is an application programming interface (API) that provides access to all components of the
framework (including the individual hydrologic routines) via Python, while maintaining high
computational performance as the algorithms are implemented in modern C++. The API allows for
rapid exploration of different model configurations and selection of an optimal forecast
model. Several different methods may be aggregated and composed, allowing direct intercomparison
of models and algorithms. In order to provide enterprise-level software, strong focus is given
to computational efficiency, code quality, documentation, and test coverage. Shyft is released open-source under the GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 and available at
https://gitlab.com/shyft-os (last access: 22 November 2020), facilitating effective cooperation between core developers, industry, and
research institutions.
Funder
Universitetet i Oslo
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference85 articles.
1. Abramowitz, G.: Towards a public, standardized,
diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 819–827,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-819-2012, 2012. a 2. Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and
Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a 3. Andersson, E. and Thépaut, J.:
ECMWF's 4D-Var data assimilation system – the genesis and ten years in operations, ECMWF
Newslett., 115, 8–12, https://doi.org/10.21957/wnmguimihe, 2008. a 4. Anghileri, D., Voisin, N., Castelletti, A., Pianosi, F.,
Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Value of long-term streamflow forecasts to reservoir
operations for water supply in snow-dominated river catchments, Water Resour. Res., 52,
4209–4225, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017864, 2016. a, b 5. Anghileri, D., Monhart, S., Zhou, C., Bogner, K., Castelletti,
A., Burlando, P., and Zappa, M.: The Value of Subseasonal Hydrometeorological Forecasts to
Hydropower Operations: How Much Does Preprocessing Matter?, Water Resour. Res., 55, 10,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025280, 2019. a, b, c
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|