Typhoon-associated air quality over the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area, China: machine-learning-based prediction and assessment
-
Published:2023-03-10
Issue:5
Volume:16
Page:1279-1294
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Chen YilinORCID, Yang Yuanjian, Gao MengORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The summertime air pollution events endangering public
health in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area are connected
with typhoons. The wind of the typhoon periphery results in poor diffusion
conditions and favorable conditions for transboundary air pollution. Random
forest models are established to predict typhoon-associated air quality in
the area. The correlation coefficients and the root mean square errors in
the air quality index (AQI) and PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2
and O3 concentrations are 0.84 (14.88), 0.86 (10.31 µg m−3), 0.84 (17.03 µg m−3), 0.51 (8.13 µg m−3), 0.80 (13.64 µg m−3) and 0.89 (22.43 µg m−3), respectively.
Additionally, the prediction models for non-typhoon days are established.
According to the feature importance output of the models, the differences in
the meteorological drivers of typhoon days and non-typhoon days are
revealed. On typhoon days, the air quality is dominated by local source
emission and accumulation as the sink of pollutants reduces significantly
under stagnant weather, while it is dominated by the transportation and scavenging effect of sea breeze on non-typhoon days. Therefore, our findings suggest that
different air pollution control strategies for typhoon days and non-typhoon
days should be proposed.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Arnold, J. R., Dennis, R. L., and Tonnesen, G. S.: Diagnostic evaluation of
numerical air quality models with specialized ambient observations: testing
the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system (CMAQ) at selected SOS
95 ground sites, Atmos. Environ., 37, 1185–1198,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01008-7, 2003. 2. Bai, K., Li, K., Chang, N.-B., and Gao, W.: Advancing the prediction
accuracy of satellite-based PM2.5 concentration mapping: A perspective of data mining through in situ PM2.5 measurements, Environ. Pollut., 254, 113047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113047, 2019. 3. Bochenek, B. and Ustrnul, Z.: Machine Learning in Weather Prediction and
Climate Analyses–Applications and Perspectives, Atmosphere, 13, 180,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020180, 2022. 4. Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001. 5. Che, H., Xia, X., Zhu, J., Li, Z., Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Goloub, P., Chen, H., Estelles, V., Cuevas-Agulló, E., Blarel, L., Wang, H., Zhao, H., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Sun, J., Tao, R., Zhang, X., and Shi, G.: Column aerosol optical properties and aerosol radiative forcing during a serious haze-fog month over North China Plain in 2013 based on ground-based sunphotometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2125–2138, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2125-2014, 2014.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|