Abstract
Cutting silicon solar cells from their host wafer into smaller cells reduces the output current per cut cell and therefore allows for reduced ohmic losses in series interconnection at module level. This comes with a trade-off of unpassivated cutting edges, which result in power losses. This performance drop can be seen in fill factor FF and open-circuit voltage VOC losses on cut cell level. Based on experimental realization of different solar cell layouts on the same industrial blue wafers (solar cell precursors), a combined simulation method to predict the performance on module level is demonstrated. This method uses Gridmaster+ for cell simulation and SmartCalc. Module for module simulation. The accuracy of the simulations is demonstrated by comparing with experimental results both from host and cut cell level. In addition, significant influence of the current–voltage (I–V) measurement configuration is demonstrated, mainly affecting FF. Using flexible methods like GridTOUCH® for I–V testing gives fast results but can also lead to overestimation of the host cell performance, resulting in overestimated cell-to-module losses or unreasonable comparisons between hosts and cut cells. It is also demonstrated that application of the passivated edge technology (PET) yields I–V characteristics close to those of cells with ideal edges, i.e., without edge recombination. The implications on the module efficiency are also compared between modules built using cells with and without edge passivation, giving the highest efficiency for a shingled module with PET.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
Reference28 articles.
1. Guo S., Singh J.P., Peters I.M. et al., A quantitative analysis of photovoltaic modules using halved cells, Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/739374
2. International ITRPV Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV): 2023 Results, 14th Edition (ITROV, 2023)
3. Baliozian P., Klasen N., Wöhrle N. et al., PERC-based shingled solar cells and modules at Fraunhofer ISE, Photovolt. Int. 43, 129 (2019)
4. Wöhrle N., Fellmeth T.,Lohmüller E. et al., The SPEER solar cell − simulation study of shingled PERC technology based stripe cells, in 33rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. Proceedings (2017), pp. 844–848
5. Schulte-Huxel H., Kraft A., Roessler T. et al., Chapter 10: Module interconnection technologies, in Silicon Solar Cell Metallization and Module Technology, edited by Dullweber, T. Tous L. (IET, 2021), pp. 435–489