Contribution of Beam-Column Connections with Bolted Angles in the Reserve Capacity and Full-Scale Cyclic Testing-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Contribution of Beam-Column Connections with Bolted Angles in the Reserve Capacity and Full-Scale Cyclic Testing

Published:2018-02 Issue: Volume:763 Page:475-484
ISSN:1662-9795
Container-title:Key Engineering Materials
language:
Short-container-title:KEM

Author:

Béland Thierry¹,Tremblay Robert¹,Sizemore Joshua²,Fahnestock Larry A.²,Bradley Cameron³,Hines Eric³

Affiliation:

1. Polytechnique Montreal

2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

3. Tufts University

Abstract

Partially restrained beam-column connections can be used in the gravity load system of building structures to develop moment frame action to enhance collapse prevention for low-ductility steel lateral systems. The benefit from such reserve lateral strength and stiffness is illustrated for a low-rise building with steel braced frames designed in accordance with Canadian provisions for seismic force resisting systems of the Conventional Construction category. Preliminary results from a comprehensive cyclic test program recently completed on beam-to-column joints with bolted double web angle acting with top and seat angles are presented. The test program included 23 full-scale beam-to-column sub-assemblages subjected to combined gravity shear forces and cyclic rotational demands. Experimental observations on the deformation patterns and failure modes are presented together with representative hysteretic moment-rotation responses of bolted double web angles without and with top and seat angles.

Publisher

Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science

Link

https://www.scientific.net/KEM.763.475.pdf

Reference14 articles.

1. NRCC, National Building Code of Canada, 14th ed., National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, (2015).

2. ASCE, ASCE/SEI 7-16, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Enginers (ASCE), Reston, VI, (2016).

3. CSA, CSA S16-14, Design of Steel Structures, Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, ON, (2014).

4. Hines EM, Appel ME, Cheever PJ, Collapse performance of low-ductility chevron braced steel frames in moderate seismic regions, Engineering Journal, AISC, 46: 149-180, (2009).

5. Li G, Fahnestock LA, Seismic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Representing Low-Ductility Steel Concentrically Braced Frames with Reserve Capacity, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 139(2): 199-211, (2013).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dual system design for a low-ductility concentrically braced frame with a reserve moment frame;Structures;2021-12

2. Experimental investigation of steel building gravity framing systems under strong earthquake shaking;Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering;2019-01