Son Dört Yılda Üçüncü Basamak Hastanemizde Doğumu Gerçekleşen Çoğul Gebelik Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Author:

ŞEHİRLİ KINCI Özge1,KINCI Mehmet Ferdi2,TAŞTAN Leyla3,SARUHAN Ercan4,SİVASLIOĞLU Ahmet Akın3

Affiliation:

1. Liv Hospital

2. Muğla Education and Research Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department

3. MUĞLA ÜNİVERSİTESİ

4. MUGLA UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of multiple pregnancies between January 2016 and December 2020 in our hospital, which is a tertiary center. Materials and Methods: 107 multiple pregnancies were included in the study among 6567 pregnant women who were delivered between January 2016 and December 2020 in Muğla University Training and Research Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic. Of these retrospectively evaluated pregnant women, 106 were twins and 1 was triplet. Results: It was determined that 87 (80.18%) twin pregnancies were diamniotic-dichorionic, 11 (10.37%) were dichorionic-monoamniotic, and 8 (7.54%) were monochorionic-monoamniotic, respectively. 76 (71.69%) of the deliveries were with preterm delivery and 30 (28.3%) of the pregnant women were delivered at term. Twelve (11.1%) twin pregnancies were delivered by vaginal delivery, and 96 (88.9%) by cesarean section (C/S). No statistical difference was observed in terms of blood loss when the C/S and vaginal delivery groups were compared. When compared in terms of hospitalization time, it was found that the hospitalization period was shorter in the vaginal delivery group. Conclusion: The clinical results of our study are similar to the current literature. In our study, what we evaluated differently from the literature is blood loss and hospitalization time between C/S and vaginal delivery. There was no difference between C/S and vaginal delivery in terms of blood loss, and it was observed that the hospitalization period of patients who had vaginal delivery was shorter.

Publisher

Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3