Affiliation:
1. Kemerovo State University
Abstract
Introduction. Stability of financial systems has become the most important issue of economic strategizing as a result of geopolitics, global economic crisis, and pandemics, which affect regions and the state as a whole. Financial security is now the current strategic priority of socio-economic development. Study objects and methods. The present research featured Kuzbass as an example of industrial region and its financial security as a strategic characteristic of the financial system. The study of financial security relied on a systematic approach based on the dialectical perception of reality. The empirical research relied on statistical methods, analysis of existing knowledge systems, economic monitoring, etc. The resulting abstract system and theoretical generalizations made it possible to define the strategic priorities of the regional development. In economics, the consistency principle takes into account the territorial features of socio-economic systems; the specifics of natural, economic, technical, and other factors; the degree of its political, administrative, and economic independence; its interaction with other regions, etc. Results and discussion. The phenomenon of financial security of the region is considered as an element of strategic management of socio-economic development. The author determined and classified the essential characteristics of financial security to make up a scheme of formation and development of financial risk as an element of the system of strategic priorities. Within this scheme, inflation and unemployment are additional aggregate criteria for assessing the level of financial security. Conclusion. New systemic threats in the field of finance require new ways to optimize financial relations and develop a theoretical and methodological foundation for qualitative and quantitative assessments of financial security. Numerous studies focus on various aspects of financial security in order to explain the interrelations of the financial bloc with economic elements in the regions, in Russia, and abroad. These relationships define the methodology for assessing the level of financial security and its subsequent consideration in strategizing. The present research compared a set of criteria with their threshold levels. However, these estimates may grow less reliable following the changes in the significance and priority of the corresponding criteria in the unstable economic and political reality. The new conditions require mobility and flexibility in adapting these criteria to the conditions of a particular region. This strategic project can be designed and implemented based on Professor V.L. Kvint’s concept of strategizing.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Reference26 articles.
1. Алабина Т. А. Организационно-экономический механизм управления государственной собственностью Кемеровской области: проблемы и совершенствование с учетом стратегии развития региона // Трансформация экономики: анализ проблем и поиск путей решений: Материалы Всероссийской (с международным участием) научно-практической конференции, посвященной 60-летию БТИ АлтГТУ. Барнаул, 2019. С. 9–13., Alabina TA. Organizational-economic mechanism of management of state property of the Kemerovo Region: Problems and improvement based on the strategy of development of the region. Transformatsiya ehkonomiki: analiz problem i poisk putey resheniy: Materialy Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 60-letiyu BTI AltGTU [Transformation of the economy: problem analysis and solutions: Proceedings of the All-Russian (with international participation) scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 60th anniversary of Biysk Technological Institute, Altai State Technical University]; 2019; Biysk. Barnaul: Polzunov Altai State Technical University; 2019. p. 9–13. (In Russ.)
2. Асимметричные эффекты денежно-кредитной политики в регионах России / О. А. Демидова [и др.] // Вопросы экономики. 2021. № 6. С. 77–102. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-6-77-102, Demidova OA, Karnaukhova EE, Korshunov DA, Myasnikov AA, Seregina SF. Asymmetric effects of monetary policy in Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(6):77–102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-6-77-102
3. Готовский А. В. Вклад импортозамещения в экономический рост России // Вопросы экономики. 2021. № 4. С. 58–78. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-58-78, Gotovsky AV. Import substitution contribution to Russia’s economic growth. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(4):58–78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-58-78
4. Гурвич Е. Т., Прилепский И. В. Влияние финансовых санкций на российскую экономику // Вопросы экономики. 2016. № 1. С. 5–35. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-1-5-35, Gurvich ET, Prilepskiy IV. The impact of financial sanctions on the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2016;(1):5–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-1-5-35
5. Данилов Ю. А. Оценка места Российской Федерации на глобальном финансовом рынке // Вопросы экономики. 2016. № 11. С. 100–116. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-100-116, Danilov YuA. Assessment of the place of the Russian federation in the global financial market. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2016;(11):100–116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-100-116
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献