Prediction of Residual Defects after Code Review Based on Reviewer Confidence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prediction of Residual Defects after Code Review Based on Reviewer Confidence

Published:2024-03-01 Issue:3 Volume:E107.D Page:273-276
ISSN:0916-8532
Container-title:IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
language:en
Short-container-title:IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst.

Author:

KOMEDA Shin¹,TSUNODA Masateru¹,NAKASAI Keitaro²,UWANO Hidetake³

Affiliation:

1. Kindai University

2. College of Technology, Osaka Metropolitan University College of Technology

3. National Institute of Technology, Nara College

Publisher

Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/transinf/E107.D/3/E107.D_2023MPL0002/_pdf

Reference12 articles.

1. [1] B. Floyd, T. Santander, and W. Weimer, “Decoding the representation of code in the brain: an fMRI study of code review and expertise,” Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp.175-186, 2017. 10.1109/icse.2017.24

2. [2] H. Hijazi, J. Duraes, R. Couceiro, J. Castelhano, R. Barbosa, J. Medeiros, M. Castelo-Branco, P. De Carvalho, and H. Madeira, “Quality Evaluation of Modern Code Reviews Through Intelligent Biometric Program Comprehension,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol.49, no.2, pp.626-645, 2023. 10.1109/TSE.2022.3158543

3. [3] M. Höst, B. Regnell, and C. Wohlin, “Using Students as Subjects — A Comparative Study ofStudents and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol.5, no.3, pp.201-214, 2000. 10.1023/A:1026586415054

4. [4] R. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, Forecasting: principles and practice, Otexts, 2021.

5. [5] Information-technology Promotion Agency (IPA), Guidebook of devemopment methods to achieve high reliablility software, IPA, 2011 (in Japanese).